Many Mexicans Believe the Southwestern U.S. belongs to Mexico

THEY CALL IT “THE NATION OF AZTLAN” AND WANT IT BACK (Double-click image to enlarge)

FrontPage Magazine reported on the radicals behind the pro-illegal-immigration groups and their agenda of “reclaiming” the southwestern United States for Mexico. They call that region Nation of Aztlán: At colleges and universities across the country, the Movimiento Estudiantil de Chicanos de Aztlan (The Student Movement of Aztlan Chicanos) — better known by its acronym, MEChA — is calling for the surrender of wide swaths of American territory to Mexico. Worse yet, in doing so, it has the support of university administrators, elected officials, and — thanks to the mandatory student activity fees on which the organization depends — tuition-paying students. Founded in the late 1960s, MEChA has spent the last three decades indoctrinating Latino students on American campuses in the ideology of reconquista (reconquest). According to MEChA propaganda, the Southwestern United States — including California, Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, as well as parts of Nevada, Utah, and Colorado — sits on the territory of the ancient (and mythical) “Nation of Aztlan.” Supposedly the cradle of Aztec civilization, MEChA charges that Aztlan was unjustly seized by the United States following the Mexican-American War. Now MEChA wants this territory given back to its alleged rightful owners: the people and government of Mexico. As a matter of fact, the American Southwest was not, as MEChA claims, “stolen” from Mexico. Following the Mexican-American War, the government of Mexico legally ceded this territory to the United States (by the Treaty of Guadalupe de Hidalgo, 1848). Nor has there ever been any place called “Aztlan” on American soil, much less a “Nation of Aztlan.” Invented 30 years ago by radical Latino activists, the Nation of Atzlan has more in common with Atlantis than with Israel. [...] By supporting continued high levels of Mexican immigration to the United States, MEChA hopes to achieve by sheer weight of numbers what the U.S. government long ago achieved by force of arms: the re-partition of the American Southwest. To this end, MEChA endorses a cocktail of pro-immigration policies. These include open borders, government benefits (including the right to vote and obtain drivers licenses) for non-citizens, amnesty for illegal aliens, dual citizenship, state recognition of Spanish as an official language, and racial set-asides in education and corporate hiring. MEChA is hardly alone in promoting these policies. The National Council of La Raza [the Race] and the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), two of the better known Latino advocacy groups, also support them… As one of MEChA’s founding documents, El Plan Espiritual de Aztlan (The Spiritual Plan of Atzlan) puts it: “In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud historical heritage but also of the brutal ‘gringo’ invasion of our territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land of Aztlan from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their birth and consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, declare that the call of our blood is our power, our responsibility, and our inevitable destiny.” El Plan Espiritual is typical, not just for its atrocious prose, but also for its violent racial overtones. Indeed, to judge by the numerous Web sites and student publications sponsored by MEChA, life after the reconquest is going to be a pretty dreary affair. Just beneath the surface of the Marxist-inspired “union of free pueblos” imagined by MEChA visionaries runs a rich vein of race hatred and conspiratorial anti-Semitism. As an editorial addressed to “capitalist whites” in the University of California Irvine’s La Voz Mestiza (The Mestiza Voice) concludes, “You’ve spilled enough of our blood, now it’s your turn to bleed you [expletive] sub-human beasts.” Or, as one of MEChA’s many charming slogans has it, “por la Raza todo; fuera la Raza nada”: for those of our race, everything; for those outside of it, nothing.

RELATED - Mexican Horror: 23 People Killed in Nuevo Laredo (9 Hanged, 14 Decapitated) - “U.S.-Mexico Border Safest Area in America,” says U.S. Customs and Border Director in Laredo, Texas - Mexico abuses illegal immigrants, but demand citizenship for Mexicans living in USA (video) - History: ‘Cinco de Mayo’ - Arizona Law is Not Anti-Immigrant (Read SB1070 Here) - MEXICO VS. UNITED STATES: MEXICAN IMMIGRATION LAWS ARE TOUGHER

What if Trayvon Had Been White, and the Shooter Black?

Via AmericanThinker: There would be no white mobs in the street chanting “No justice, no peace!” There would be no whites holding a “million hoodie march” in New York City. There would be no white equivalent of Al Sharpton, the professional race-baiter behind the 1987 Tawana Brawley hoax, leading marches in the streets of the shooter’s hometown. There would be no Federal civil rights investigation by the Justice Department. There would be no comments from a president who seems congenitally unable to keep his mouth shut on matters involving left-wing political correctness. And there would be no national media attention from biased, left-wing “reporters.” We know this because in fact, such an event occurred in 2009 in Greece, N.Y., a suburb of Rochester. Roderick Scott, a black man, shot and killed an unarmed white teen, Christopher Cervini, whom he believed was burglarizing a neighbor’s car… [...] Despite the racial difference between the shooter and the decedent, there were no allegations of racial bias. Scott was not charged with a hate crime. There was no Federal civil rights investigation. There were no white protests. The case was settled for what it was: a tragedy caused by a series of poor decisions on behalf of the shooter, and a split-second decision that will forever be second-guessed. [...] Whatever happened in the George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin case, one thing is perfectly clear: it’s high time this country quit the racial dog-and-pony show, and judged each criminal case on its individual merits instead of allowing the race-baiting demagogues to leverage each incident for political advantage in the streets and in the media. Read the full article  here.

Politico & MSNBC Refer to Conservative Florida Voters as ‘Crackers’

LIBERALS PROJECTING THEIR BIGOTRY ONTO CONSERVATIVES Politico reporter Jonathan Martin while speaking to MSNBC anchor Chuck Todd this morning nonchalantly used an offensive epithet to describe voters in the Florida panhandle: MARTIN: “I think the other reason why north Florida is going to be fascinating to watch tonight is because it’s going to give us a sense of what’s ahead in March, when this primary does move to the deep south states. As you know, Chuck, a lot of those counties in the panhandle, in north Florida, the “cracker counties”, if you will… TODD: Right. MARTIN: …more resemble Georgia and Alabama than they do Florida. So, it’s going to be interesting to see if Romney can really show some signs of strength in and around places like Pensacola, Panama City, Tallahassee and Jacksonville.” MSNBC’s Chuck Todd didn’t have any problem when he heard the pejorative. He just replied, “Right.”

As NewsBusters’ Scott Whitlock indicates, “the Politico reporter wasn’t on local Florida TV and the rest of the country sees the term as an insult. The context of the comment came while talking about conservative Southerners. Remember, Martin claimed that Florida is “going to give us a sense of what’s ahead in March, when this primary does move to the Deep South states.”" John Nolte from BigJournalism.com correctly points out that “these are the same MSM leftists who have and will continue to attempt to define every effective attack against Barack Obama as ‘racist’ or as some sort of ‘racial dog-whistle’…The term ‘cracker’ creates the image of the conservative-voting Florida panhandle Obama’s MSM Palace Guards want to create. Because Obama can’t win on his failed record, the MSM intends to make sure America understands that only racists and a racist country would dare fire the first black president.”

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Forgets the Democrats’ Racist History

FEAR-MONGERING AND TRANSFERING GUILT Rep. Wasserman Schultz believes that asking for ID prior to voting is racist. She forgets it was Democrats who started the Jim Crow laws and the KKK Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), attacked Republicans for the Voter ID laws trying to stop illegal aliens from voting. She said, Republicans “literally want to drag us…back to Jim Crow.” Democrats like Wasserman Schultz think that it is racist to have safeguards against voter fraud, i.e., laws which require citizens to validate their identity and eligibility prior to voting. Townhall.com reported that when it comes to voter ID laws, “there is no evidence that the [photo ID] requirement reduces minority participation. In Georgia, where photo IDs became a requirement in 2007, minorities voted in record numbers in 2008 and 2010. Turnout among Hispanic voters jumped 140 percent in the state in 2008 and 42 percent among blacks compared with 2004, a change attributed in part to President Obama’s candidacy. Two years later, in the midterm election, turnout also rose among Hispanics and African-Americans, according to data from the Georgia secretary of state.” Wasserman Schultz was not only demagoguing the voting ID laws but she was also lying about the Jim Crow laws. She failed to mention that it was Democrats who started the Jim Crow laws. Democrats love to re-write history and transfer their racist past onto Republicans.

“Now you have the Republicans, who want to literally drag us all the way back to Jim Crow laws and literally – and very transparently – block access to the polls to voters who are more likely to vote for Democratic candidates than Republican candidates. And it’s nothing short of that blatant.” Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Democrat-FL) on the African-American network TV One’s “Washington Watch” program, 6/5/2011

DEMOCRATS’ RACIST HISTORY Democrats and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) don’t want Americans to remember the racist history of the Democrat Party. Even on their DNC website, Democrats have erased their party’s horrific racist record. But Jeffrey Lord on a WSJ article recounted what’s missing on the DNC website about the Democrats’ History:
There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were six from 1840 through 1860. There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who owned slaves. There were seven from 1800 through 1861 There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms that either supported segregation outright or were silent on the subject. There were 20, from 1868 through 1948. There is no reference to “Jim Crow” as in “Jim Crow laws,” nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them. These were the post-Civil War laws passed enthusiastically by Democrats in that pesky 52-year part of the DNC’s missing years. These laws segregated public schools, public transportation, restaurants, rest rooms and public places in general (everything from water coolers to beaches). The reason Rosa Parks became famous is that she sat in the “whites only” front section of a bus, the “whites only” designation the direct result of Democrats. There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, which, according to Columbia University historian Eric Foner, became “a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party.” Nor is there reference to University of North Carolina historian Allen Trelease’s description of the Klan as the “terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.” There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution. The 13th banned slavery. The 14th effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision (made by Democratic pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves. The 15th gave black Americans the right to vote. There is no reference to the fact that Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress over the veto of President Andrew Johnson, who had been a Democrat before joining Lincoln’s ticket in 1864. The law was designed to provide blacks with the right to own private property, sign contracts, sue and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding. There is no reference to the Democrats’ opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1875. It was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses Grant. The law prohibited racial discrimination in public places and public accommodations. There is no reference to the Democrats’ 1904 platform, which devotes a section to “Sectional and Racial Agitation,” claiming the GOP’s protests against segregation and the denial of voting rights to blacks sought to “revive the dead and hateful race and sectional animosities in any part of our common country,” which in turn “means confusion, distraction of business, and the reopening of wounds now happily healed.” There is no reference to four Democratic platforms, 1908-20, that are silent on blacks, segregation, lynching and voting rights as racial problems in the country mount. By contrast the GOP platforms of those years specifically address “Rights of the Negro” (1908), oppose lynching (in 1912, 1920, 1924, 1928) and, as the New Deal kicks in, speak out about the dangers of making blacks “wards of the state.” There is no reference to the Democratic Convention of 1924, known to history as the “Klanbake.” The 103-ballot convention was held in Madison Square Garden. Hundreds of delegates were members of the Ku Klux Klan, the Klan so powerful that a plank condemning Klan violence was defeated outright. To celebrate, the Klan staged a rally with 10,000 hooded Klansmen in a field in New Jersey directly across the Hudson from the site of the convention. Attended by hundreds of cheering convention delegates, the rally featured burning crosses and calls for violence against African-Americans and Catholics. There is no reference to the fact that it was Democrats who segregated the federal government, at the direction of President Woodrow Wilson upon taking office in 1913. There \is a reference to the fact that President Harry Truman integrated the military after World War II. There is reference to the fact that Democrats created the Federal Reserve Board, passed labor and child welfare laws, and created Social Security with Wilson’s New Freedom and FDR’s New Deal. There is no mention that these programs were created as the result of an agreement to ignore segregation and the lynching of blacks. Neither is there a reference to the thousands of local officials, state legislators, state governors, U.S. congressmen and U.S. senators who were elected as supporters of slavery and then segregation between 1800 and 1965. Nor is there reference to the deal with the devil that left segregation and lynching as a way of life in return for election support for three post-Civil War Democratic presidents, Grover Cleveland, Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt. There is no reference that three-fourths of the opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Bill in the U.S. House came from Democrats, or that 80% of the “nay” vote in the Senate came from Democrats. Certainly there is no reference to the fact that the opposition included future Democratic Senate leader Robert Byrd of West Virginia (a former Klan member) and Tennessee Senator Albert Gore Sr., father of Vice President Al Gore. Last but certainly not least, there is no reference to the fact that Birmingham, Ala., Public Safety Commissioner Bull Connor, who infamously unleashed dogs and fire hoses on civil rights protestors, was in fact–yes indeed–a member of both the Democratic National Committee and the Ku Klux Klan.
SOURCES Video: http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona/posts/135901243153220 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121856786326834083.html http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2011/06/07/dnc_chair_gop_aims_to_literally_drag_the_country_back_to_jim_crow_era MORE Democrats’ Racist Past Log: Democrats’ Racism and Intolerance

BLACK BABIES TARGETED BY PLANNED PARENTHOOD ABORTION CLINICS (statistics, non-graphic video)

SILENT GENOCIDE IN AMERICA (Hat tip: Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King, Jr.) MORE BLACK BABIES KILLED IN ABORTIONS (Statistics) Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in America.  78% of their clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but 35% of the abortions in America. Are we being targeted? Isn’t that genocide? We are the only minority in America that is on the decline in population. If the current trend continues, by 2038 the black vote will be insignificant. Did you know that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was a devout racist who created the Negro Project designed to sterilize unknowing black women and others she deemed as undesirables of society? The founder of Planned Parenthood said, “Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated.” How is her vision being fulfilled today?Minority women constitute only about 26% of the female population (age 15-44) in the United States, but they underwent approximately 36% of the abortions. According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, black women are more than 3 times as likely as white women to have an abortion. On average, 1,452 black babies are aborted every day in the United States. This incidence of abortion has resulted in a tremendous loss of life. It has been estimated that since 1973 Black women have had over 13 million abortions. Michael Novak had calculated “Since the number of current living Blacks (in the U.S.) is 31 million, the missing 10 million represents an enormous loss, for without abortion, America’s Black community would now number 41 million persons. It would be 35% larger than it is. Abortion has swept through the Black community like a scythe, cutting down every fourth member.” A highly significant 1993 Howard University study showed that African American women over age 50 were 4.7 times more likely to get breast cancer if they had had any abortions compared to women who had not had any abortions. ABORTION CLINICS TARGET BLACKS “Taxpayer-funded Planned Parenthood aborted 324,008 innocent lives and only made 2,405 adoption referrals according to their own latest Annual Report; that’s 135 children killed for every 1 adoption referral.” [Pastor] Hoye says he’s excited about the billboard campaign as he has been trying to raise nationwide awareness of the way in which abortions target black children. “The impact of abortion in the African-American community is the Darfur of America,” Hoye declares, citing the 53 million aborted since 1973, 18 million of which are African-American. Dr. La Verne Tolbert, a former Planned Parenthood board member, says black children are targeted through the schools for abortions in California. “In California, children are targeted for abortions through school-based clinics and school-linked clinics, which are family planning clinics on or near school grounds. Girls are taken off campus to a Planned Parenthood clinic, where abortions are performed without parental consent or notification,” she said.

ABORTION BY SUCTION Fr. Frank Pavone of Priests for Life shows the instruments of suction abortion and challenges abortion supporters:

- Alveda King’s blog - Priests For Life - Jill Stanek RELATED - Obama & Big Abortion - FactSheets: Abortion - The Philadelphia Horror: How mass murder gets a pass

MLK DREAM: Colorblind America (video)

‘Freedom Is Colorblind’ Anthem Takes on MSM Depictions of Conservative ‘Racism’ (H/t: Breitbart) Martin Luther King, Jr.: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
- MLK Day proposal: Give the race card a rest - Martin Luther King – Republican - Civil Rights Acts and Republicans - Black babies targeted by abortion clinics

OBAMA’S FRIEND, PROFESSOR GATES: AFRICANS SOLD OTHER AFRICANS INTO SLAVERY (video)

BLACKS ALONG WITH WHITES, MUSLIMS, ASIANS, ETC. PARTICIPATED IN ENSLAVING OTHERS. Even Obama’s friend, Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr., admits that black Africans participated in the horrendous business of slavery.
	Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. on PBS: “Africans sold other Africans to the Europeans.” “There were African middlemen and they’d fight wars with other Africans to enslave them and to sell them to the white man.” “Slavery was a huge business for different African kingdoms.” “The story that we got when we were kids…it’s not how it happened.”
Slavery was established before Europeans arrived: “Domestic slave ownership as well as domestic and international slave trades in western Africa preceded the late 15th-century origins of the Atlantic slave trade.” “Not only was slavery an established institution in West Africa before European traders arrived, but Africans were also involved in a trans-Saharan trade in slaves along these routes.” “Enslavement was most often a byproduct of local warfare, kidnapping, or the manipulation of religious and judicial institutions.” SLAVERY WAS NOT INVENTED BY WHITE AMERICANS Despite all the efforts by race charlatans, race hustlers and race-obsessed politicians who are in the business of keeping Americans divided, the historical facts are the same: White Americans did not invent slavery. Slavery was widely practiced centuries before America came into existence. Blacks, whites, Asians, Muslims, Native Americans, and others participated in enslaving others.

SHIRLEY SHERROD/BREITBART/NAACP – Transcript, Latest News

Updated by FactReal on July 28, 2010

LATEST NEWS ON SHERROD - Full Transcript & Full Video of former USDA official Shirley Sherrod’s speech at the NAACP event on March 27, 2010. - Breitbart videos WERE NOT DOCTORED; they were UNEDITED EXCERPTS - NEW SHERROD VIDEO: Sherrod’s Husband: “Finally We Must Stop the White Man & His Uncle Toms From Stealing Our Elections” - SHIRLEY SHARROD SAYS THAT FOXNEWS IS RACIST…because she doesn’t agree with their reporting (MediaMatters interview – 7/21/2010) - Sweetness&Light comments the Sherrod’s interview with MediaMatters - Sherrod’s husband, Charles, was one of the founders of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) which became a pro-violent group under Stokely Carmichael and H. Rapp Brown. (H/t: Sweetness&Light) - Sherrod calls Breitbart a racist…because he opposes Obama’s policies (CNN Anderson Cooper interview – 7/22/2010) - Who are the Sherrods? (7/26/2010) - Sherrod Story False (7/26/2010) - NEW SHERROD VIDEO: Shirley’s Husband Caught On Tape Pushing Black Separatism (7/27/2010) - Sherrod Offered ‘Advocacy, Outreach’ Job (7/28/2010) - Fox News’s Bret Baier Rips Howard Dean for Saying Chris Wallace Lied About Sherrod Coverage (video) (7/28/2010) - New meme: Fox News got Sherrod fired because its website published a story about her (7/28/2010) - Media Matters Dishonestly Spins Anti-Fox Message Over Sherrod Firing (7/28/2010) Posted in Media, Racism | Tagged: Breitbard, CNN, Democrats, Family, NAACP, News, Politics, Race, Racism, Republicans, Sherrod, Shirley Sherrod, Society, USDA | Leave a Comment » « Previous Entries   Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Andreas09 by Andreas Viklund.