FactReal

QUICK FACTS: Politics, News, Economy, Religion, History…for busy people!

GA Senator Report: Election Fraud Findings & Testimonies from Public Hearing (12/3/2020)

Posted by FactReal on December 23, 2020


Georgia State Senator, William T. Ligon, prepared a summary of testimonies & findings from the public hearing of December 3, 2020, held by the Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee on election fraud.

Report (PDF): The Chairman’s Report of the Election Law Study Subcommittee of the Standing Senate Judiciary Committee, 12/17/2020:

HIGHLIGHTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
– The November 3, 2020 General Election was chaotic and any reported results must be viewed as untrustworthy.
– The Subcommittee took evidence from witnesses and received affidavits sworn under oath.

– The Subcommittee heard evidence that:
Proper protocols were not used to ensure chain of custody of the ballots
Large numbers of fraudulent ballots were introduced into the pool of ballots that were counted as voted; there is no way of tracing the ballots after they have been separated from the point of origin.
Pristine ballots whose origin looked suspicious …and the inability of poll workers to distinguish between test ballots and absentee ballots.
Signatures were not consistently verified according to law in the absentee balloting process.
On Election Night, ballots were not secured … seals and security tags were not used, and the chain of custody was often lax or non-existent.
During the recount process, unsecured ballots … had broken seals and open cases of ballots laying around for hours or overnight in unsecured locations.
There was:
– – a lack of enforcement of the law,
– – sloppy handling of the ballots by those counting,
– – deliberate covering-up of voting numbers by workers,
– – lack of following the process during the recount,
– – unsafe handling of military ballots, and insecure data such as on laptops and flash drives.

– – Many equipment failures
– – Ballots were counted more than once.
Coordinated effort to prevent a transparent process of observing the counting of ballots

Hostility to Republican poll workers
– Directional signage was unavailable, doors were locked, and Republican poll watchers were sent home early or given menial assignments.
Monitors were often kept at an unreasonably long distance.
– Monitors were blocked from having the visual ability to see what was written on the ballots or to have any meaningful way to check the counting or to double-check that what was counted was actually assigned to the right candidate.
– – They also could not observe what was entered into the ARLO system, nor could they be told the count that was being entered into ARLO.
– – Instead, they were told that those numbers would be totaled and come back from the Secretary of State’s Office.
– – They were also told not to take pictures, film, or have other means of acquiring proof of the process that they were experiencing based on a rule from the State Elections Board. That rule contravenes the spirit and purpose of the election law.

The Secretary of State’s Office was unresponsive to its hotline.
– It has been unresponsive to many who wonder if their vote ever really counted.
– The office has turned a blind eye to fraud to the point that it ought to be considered gross negligence.

Dominion Voting machines:
– The Subcommittee did not have time to investigate the numerous publicly reported issues with the Dominion voting machines.
– The Subcommittee takes notice of the various publicly reported functions of the machines and heard evidence that the machines can duplicate fraudulent ballots
– The system responds wirelessly to being reset from an unknown location as happened with the poll books.
– Dominion machines can be programmed with algorithms that reallocate votes between candidates.
– Dominion machines are programmed to count votes using percentages of whole numbers rather than actual votes.
– The history and control of the company that owns the Dominion voting system is unclear and provides serious implications of foreign interference in the U.S. election.

ORAL TESTIMONY
– Violation of Ballot/Computer Security Procedures During Early Voting & on Election Day
– Recount: Counting Votes Without Monitoring, or Without Meaningful Monitoring
– No Chain of Custody
– Suspicious “Pristine” Absentee Ballots
– Duplication of Ballots Without Oversight
– Denial of Entry to Election Day Poll Watchers and During Recount
– Hostility
– Wildly Disparate Vote Totals from the Recount
– Ballots Counted from Ineligible Voters
– Constitutional Violations of Duly Passed Law
– Data Analysis in General and Dominion Issues
– Outside Influence Over Governmental Election Functions
– Voters Unable to Verify Votes Counted

Georgia Election Fraud News:
READ: Sidney Powell’s SCOTUS Emergency Filing for Georgia (12/11/2020)
Video: Same Ballots Scanned Multiple Times in Georgia (#SuitcaseGate)
PROOF: Georgia Election Workers Sent Home at 10:30 PM on Election Night (#SuitcaseGate)
ON TAPE: Georgia Election Official: “Ballot Counting to Stop by 11PM on Election Night” (#SuitcaseGate – 2020 Election Fraud)
VIDEO: Election Fraud Caught on Tape in Georgia
FRAUD EVIDENCE HERE
Video: Votes Deducted Live on TV (Election Day)
LINKS: Evidence of Election Fraud with Sources
LIST: 2020 Election Fraud, Irregularities
.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s