QUICK FACTS: Politics, News, Economy, Religion, History…for busy people!

Archive for the ‘Left’ Category

TRANSCRIPT: Rudy Giuliani’s Statement during Press Conference 11/19/2020

Posted by FactReal on November 20, 2020

Overview of the evidence: Thousands of Biden-only ballots were brought in truck at 4:30am and triple-counted; overvotes of 200% in some precincts; Democrat voters allowed to “cure” their defective ballots but not Republicans; in person voters found someone had previously filled absentee ballots in their name; backdated ballots; people were trained to cheat: not to look for deficiencies in ballots, not to ask for photo ID, not to check signatures, etc. All come from affidavits signed under penalty of perjury.

Trump’s legal team held a press conference yesterday in D.C. They gave an overview of the evidence of massive election fraud that they have uncovered so far and that they will present in court. Below is a transcript of what Rudy Giuliani presented.
Other video sources: here.
RUSH TRANSCRIPT: RUDY GIULIANI, Nov. 19, 2020: “Well, this is representative of our legal team. We’re representing President Trump and we’re representing the Trump campaign. When I finish, Sidney Powell and then Jenna Ellis will follow me. And we will present in brief the evidence that we’ve collected over the last — I guess it is two weeks. Also, Joseph diGenova, Victoria Toensing are here with me. There are a lot more lawyers working on this, but we’re the — I guess we’re the senior lawyers. And Boris Epshteyn.

So I guess the best way to describe this is, when we began our representation of the president, we certainly were confronted with a very anomalous set of results. The president way ahead on election night, seven or 800,000 in Pennsylvania, somehow he lost Pennsylvania. We have statisticians willing to testify that that’s almost statistically impossible to have happened in the period of time that it happened. But, of course, that’s just speculation.

As we started investigating, both our investigations and the very patriotic and brave American citizens that have come forward are extraordinary, extraordinary number of people, extraordinary number of witnesses. And what emerged very quickly is this is not a singular voter fraud in one state. This pattern repeats itself in a number of states, almost exactly the same pattern, which to any experienced investigator, prosecutor would suggest that there was a plan from a centralized place to execute these various acts of voter fraud, specifically focused on big cities, and specifically focused on, as you would imagine, big cities controlled by Democrats.

And particularly focused on big cities that have a long history of corruption. The number of voter fraud cases in Philadelphia could fill a library. Just a few weeks ago there was a conviction for voter fraud and one 2 weeks before that. And I’ve often said, I guess sarcastically, but it’s true, the only surprise I would have found in this is if Philadelphia hadn’t cheated in this election; because for the last 60 years they’ve cheated in just about every single election. You could say the same thing about Detroit.

[2:39] Each one of these cities are cities that are controlled by Democrats, which means they can get away with anything they want to do. It means they have a certain degree of control over — certainly control the election board completely. And they control law enforcement and, unfortunately, they have some friendly judges that will issue ridiculously irrational opinions just to come out in their favor. So let’s start with the specifics.

[3:06] Pennsylvania. In Pennsylvania, the margin of victory now for Biden, which is not a victory; it’s a fraud — is 69,140 votes. The reality is that we are now at a count of 682,770 ballots for which we have affidavits that there was no inspection of that ballot at the time that it was entered in the vote. It was a mail ballot. Mail ballots are particularly prone to fraud. We were warned about that by Jimmy Carter, President Jimmy Carter and Secretary Baker in a report about a dozen years ago in which they said that mail balloting is particularly susceptible of fraud, that we should very carefully consider ever doing it and that it can be taken advantage of.

[4:05] Justice Souter warned us of the same thing in a comment in an election law case. And even the New York Times wrote articles about how dangerous mail voting, mail-in voting was. And this is the first time we ever did it en masse. And I think we proved that all three are prophets. It’s not only susceptible to fraud, it is easily susceptible to fraud, particularly if you have a plan or scheme which sounds eerily similar to what Joe Biden told us a few days before the election that he had the best voter fraud team in the world.

But they were good. I don’t know that they were that good because they made significant mistakes, like all crooks do, and we caught ’em. One of them was pushing out Republican inspectors. Every state, almost every civilized country, even Tanzania and places that you wouldn’t think of have rules about inspectors, particularly for mail-in ballots. And why particularly for mail-in ballots? Because they can more easily be defrauded and you can’t check on it.

[5:22] People who have never done a mail-in ballot, I’m going to show you why it is so easy. Well, you fill out an envelope like this. You put your — usually in New York, it would be your assembly district and precinct in which you’re voting. You fill out your name and your address and you sign it. You then use an inner envelope, and you put the ballot inside the inner envelope. You seal it all and you send it in. When it’s being counted, almost invariably in the United States up until the mass cheating that went on in this election, a Republican and a Democrat inspector, as well as others if there are other parties, is allowed to watch the unsealing of this ballot. It used to go on all over America when we conducted honest elections. Because the only time you can ever find out if it’s a fraudulent ballot is when it is looked at. The minute you approve this, it’s thrown away, gone for eternity. The only thing left is the vote. That could have been Mickey Mouse. That could have been a dead person. That could have been not filled out properly. That could have been the same person 30 times. And all these things have happened, by the way. That could have been nothing filled out. We’d never know.

[6:54] So, for example, the recount being done in Georgia will tell us nothing because these fraudulent ballots will just be counted again because they wouldn’t supply the signatures to match the ballots. So, it means nothing to have counted these ballots, because for example, in Pennsylvania where we have probably our most precise evidence, 682,770 of these ballots were cast, put in, and they weren’t inspected, which renders them ballots that are null and void. Cannot be counted, have to be removed from the vote.

Why? For several reasons, not the least of which is, that was basically only one of two places in the state where it was done. So in the other parts of the state there was a legitimate inspection of the ballots. So if you have two different standards in different parts of the state, one favoring one part of the state, the other disfavoring the other part of the state, that’s a classic violation of equal-protection clause of the United States Constitution, Bush v. Gore being the most recent case that teaches that.

[8:12] That’s not the only fraud that went on in Pennsylvania. All of the other frauds carried out in the other states by the Democrat bosses happened there as well. For example, if you’ve made a mistake in that ballot and you lived in Philadelphia or in Pittsburgh, you were allowed to fix the mistake. But if you lived in what would be considered more Republican or Trump parts of the state, you were given no such right. One of our plaintiffs, Mr. Henry, cast an absentee ballot and he failed to put it in the secure envelope inside. He just put it in open, naked. That ballot was cast aside because it was invalid, because that breaks the privacy of the vote.

In Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, if they noticed that there wasn’t an inner envelope, they’d contact the voter and allow ’em to vote again, or if you didn’t fill it out completely or if he made a mistake and didn’t sign his full name, he was allowed to cure it. There is no such provision under the law of Pennsylvania. The Democrat secretary of state made that up in order to maximize the votes in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh and to minimize the votes in the other parts of the state. Clearly illegal, clearly voter fraud, easily provable, hundreds of witnesses, maybe thousands.

[9:55] To give you another example. We have 17,000 provisional ballots cast in Pittsburgh. Do you know what a provisional ballot is? Provisional ballot usually happens this way, and about 15 of the 17,000 happened this way. You walked in and you say, “I’m here to vote today.”

“Oh, Mr. Giuliani, you already voted.”

“I did? I don’t remember voting.”

“Oh, yes, yes, you cast an absentee ballot.”

“No, I didn’t.”

“Yes, you did.”

“No, I didn’t.”

“Yes, you did.”

So why did that happen 17,000 times in Pittsburgh? People walked in thinking — actually 15,000, to be precise. Why did it happen 15,000 times that people in Pittsburgh walked in to vote and they had already voted, according to the Democrat election machine? Did they forget? That many people with bad memories in Pittsburgh? Or is the following correct? That as witnesses will testify, they were instructed by the Democrat bosses, when they had a ballot in which there was no one registered, just assign it to somebody. Just assign it to Rudy Giuliani. And maybe Rudy Giuliani wouldn’t show up to vote. And if he does show up to vote, we’ll give him a provisional ballot. That is what we call circumstantial evidence of the fraud.

The direct evidence of the fraud are the people who will testify that in fact that’s what happened to them. As well as the 50 to 60 witnesses we have for the way they were treated and not allowed to inspect the ballots. They weren’t just not allowed to do it. They were pushed. A few cases they were assaulted. In all cases they were put in a corral so far away — probably the closest they got is from here to back of that room. We could do like a — Did you all watch ‘My Cousin Vinny?’ Do you know the movie? It’s one of my favorite law movies because he comes from Brookln. And when, the nice lady who said she saw, and then he says to her, “How many fingers do I got up?” She says, “3.” Well, she was too far away to see it was only 2. These people were further away than My Cousin Vinnie was from the witness. They couldn’t see a thing.

Now, I don’t know, you’re going to tell that 60 people are lying? They didn’t just tell me this. They swore under penalty of perjury which is something no Democrat has ever done.

You don’t even ask Biden about this! You don’t put him under penalty of perjury. He doesn’t even get asked questions about it. He doesn’t get asked questions about all the evidence of the crimes that he committed. These people are under the penalty of perjury, their names are on an affidavit. They swear that they weren’t allowed to carry out their functions as inspectors. And it’s not just a technical thing. There is a reason they did it. Why would you not allow people to carry out the function they’ve been allowed to do for 50 years, 60 years? Why wouldn’t you allow inspections of those ballots? Because you knew you were going to use those ballots to catch Biden up. And you had a big road ahead of you. You had to catch him up for 700,000 to 800,000 votes that he was behind. And the only way you were going to do it was with the mail-in ballots. You couldn’t have a Democrat and Republican inspector around. They don’t even have Democrats watching because they’d be afraid that they’d be honest Democrats who would say, “You’re cheating!”

[14:02] So, that takes us to Michigan where there was an honest Democrat who said they were cheating. And we’ll show you her affidavit because I know you keep reporting falsely that we have no evidence. That we have no specific acts of fraud. That’s because the coverage of this has been almost as dishonest as the scheme itself. The American people are entitled to know this. You don’t have a right to keep it from them. You don’t have a right to lie about it and you are. I mean, you don’t report to them that a citizen of this country, a very fine woman who is willing to allow me to give you her name. I can’t give you all these affidavits because if I do, these people will be harassed. They’ll be threatened. They may lose their job. They will lose their friends. We’ve lost lawyers in this case because they’ve been threatened. We’ve had lawyers that need protection. What’s going on in this country is horrible. And the censorship that you are imposing is making it worse.

[15:14] But Jesse Jacob is an adult citizen, a resident of the state of Michigan. She’s been an employee of the city of Detroit for decades. I know her age but — she can tell you her age. She was assigned to voting duties in September and she was trained by the city of Detroit in the state of Michigan. She was basically trained to cheat. She said that, “I was instructed by my supervisor to adjust the mailing date of these absentee ballot packages to be dated earlier than when they were actually sent in. The supervisor made that announcement for all workers to engage in that fraudulent practice.” That is not me saying that. That’s just an American citizen saying that under oath. I don’t know. Maybe you could say she is lying but you can’t say there’s no evidence. This is what we call evidence. This is direct evidence, not circumstantial. I tried many, many cases as did all my colleagues here. You put a witness on a witness stand. Witness is testifying to their own knowledge. This witness goes on the witness stand and she will say, “I was told to adjust the date on the absentee ballots. I witness election workers and employees going over to the voting booth with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.” Completely illegal. She will testify to that. I don’t know. Biden’s people can cross-examine her, but you can’t just throw it away. “Gee, there’s no evidence.” Next time you say that, you’ll be lying, because there is evidence. By the way, this is public. You can all get it. It’s attached to the complaint in Costantino v. The City of Detroit.

Then she “was instructed by my supervisor not to ask for a driver’s license or any photo ID when a person was trying to vote.“ Don’t ask for identification? Why would you not ask for identification? Because you knew that a lot of people not entitled to vote are gonna come in and early vote. Because you knew that illegal immigrants were gonna be allowed to vote. You knew, if you lived in Philadelphia, unless you’re stunod — that’s an Italian expression for stupid — unless you’re stupid, you knew a lot of people were coming over from Camden to vote. They do every year. Happens all the time in Philly. It’s about as frequent as getting beaten up at a Philadelphia Eagles basketball — football game. Happens all the time. All the time.

[18:10] And it is allowed to happen because it is a Democrat, corrupt city. And it has been for years, many, many years. And they carried it out in places they could get away with it. They didn’t carry it out in neutral places. They didn’t carry it out in Republican places. They didn’t carry it out where the law is respected. They carry it out in corrupt — a corrupt city where the district attorney releases criminals en masse, which is why it has so much crime.

[18:42] She also said, “I observed a large number of people who came to the satellite location to vote in person. But they had already applied for and submitted an absentee ballot.” So she observed a lot of people voting twice. Again, this Jesse Jacob, not me. “I was instructed not to invalidate any ballots and not to look for any deficiency in the ballots.” Why would you do that? Because you’re cheating, on purpose cheating, intentionally cheating. You’re cheating as an institution. This is an instruction from the election commissioner or the employer to the worker. “Don’t look for any deficiencies in the ballots.” “I was instructed not to look at any of the signatures on the absentee ballots.” If she was instructed not to look for any of the signatures on the absentee ballots, why the heck do you sign it in the first place? In order to identify it. She was instructed not to do that because many of the absentee ballots were fraudulent. They knew that. And they didn’t want to have account of that.

[20:02] “On November 4, 2020, I was instructed to improperly pre-date the absentee ballots when the receipt date was actually after November 3rd, 2020.” Now, this is really significant because Justice Alito of the Supreme Court instructed Pennsylvania that any ballot that comes in after 8 o’clock on November 3rd, 2020, had to be put aside and not opened. Because there’s a question as to its legality and its constitutionality. What she’s telling you is that they blatantly disregarded that order, that they took ballots that were marked the 4th, and the 5th, and the 6th, and they marked it down for the 3rd in blatant disregard of the order of the United States Supreme Court. This is, this is — I don’t know if she’s a Democrat or a Republican. I assume that if she’s working, if she’s working for the — I assume if she’s working for the city of Detroit that she’s a Democrat. I assume but I may be wrong. She’s a citizen. I’ve never met her, never coached her. And I’d like you to know that it is signed under penalties of perjury.

[21:25] We have 100 more of these. I can’t show them to you because those people don’t want to be harassed. They don’t want to be — have their lives torn apart by the goons on the other side. We don’t do that to them. They’ve done that to a lot of our people. They’ve done it for 4 years and it’s outrageous that it’s tolerated. And it’s tolerated because you condone it in the press, you don’t cover it, and you don’t condemn it. And it shouldn’t happen to a Republican or a Democrat. A lawyer shouldn’t have to withdraw from a case because he’s representing the President of the United States.

There are many more affidavits here. I’d like to read them all, but I don’t have the time. You should have had the time and energy to go look for them. That’s your job — like it’s my job to defend the president and to represent the president. It’s your job to read these things and not falsely report that there’s no evidence. Do you know how many affidavits we have in the Michigan case? 220 affidavits. They’re not all public, but 8 of them are. Four affiants here — those are people who give affidavits — report an incident that, under any other circumstances, would have been on the front page of all your newspapers if it didn’t involve the hatred that you have, irrational, pathological hatred that you have for the president.

[22:52 ] What they swear to is that at 4:30 in the morning, a truck pulled up to the Detroit center where they were counting ballots. The people thought it was food, so they all ran to the truck. Wasn’t food. It was thousands and thousands of ballots and the ballots were in garbage cans, they were in paper bags, they were in cardboard boxes, and they were taken into the center. They were put on a number of tables. At that time, they thought all the Republican inspectors had left, all but two had and an employee of Dominion who we will address a little bit later, Dominion.

[23:40] Here’s what they jointly swear to, that every ballot that they could see, everything they could hear, these were ballots for Biden. When they saw a ballot, these were ballots ONLY for Biden, meaning there was no down-ticket. Just Biden. Many of them didn’t have anything on the outer envelope because these ballots were produced very quickly, very swiftly. And there are estimated to be a minimum of 60,000, maximum of 100,000. Many of them were triple-counted, which means they were put into the counting machine this way. Once, twice, three times. I didn’t see that. I don’t know that but for the fact that three American citizens are willing to swear to it. We’re not going to let them go to court and do that? We’re going to let this election go by when there are in this case 60 witnesses that can prove what I’m saying to you and other acts of fraud in Michigan? I mean, what’s happened to this country if we’re going to let that happen? What happened to this country if we’re going to cover that up? We let Al Gore carry on an election dispute longer than this one has been going on for 1 state and for chads. This happened in Pennsylvania, it happened in Michigan. Michigan probably right now, if I count up the affidavits, just one case alone, Trump v. Benson, a case that we dismissed today because that case was attempting to get the Wayne County Board of Supervisors to de-certify. Well they did. They de-certified. That case has 100 affidavits and the 100 affidavits show essentially what I’ve talked to you about.

[25:42] Counting ballots improperly, counting them three and four times, having people vote three and four times, changing and backdating ballots to the point of at least 300,000 illegitimate ballots that we can specifically identify. The margin in Michigan is 146,121 and these ballots were all cast basically in Detroit that Biden won 80-20. So you see it changes the result of the election in Michigan if you take out Wayne County. So it’s a very significant case. That is being raised in the case of Costantino v. The City of Detroit. Not by us, but by an individual plaintiff. We are helping and assisting in that case however and you can find all the affidavits that you want filed in that case. You can find out they’re not just allegations, they’re allegations supported by sworn testimony which is a lot better than Joe Biden has ever done on anything. He doesn’t answer questions, much less give you sworn affidavits.

[26:49] Wisconsin. Wisconsin had a very small margin, 20,544 last time I looked. In Wisconsin, without going into great detail, very similar plan. Republicans shut out in the City of Milwaukee and also in Madison. Republicans almost uniformly shut out from the absentee process. Not allowed to inspect, not allowed to look at the ballots. We have in Milwaukee and in the state of Wisconsin a much stricter law. Wisconsin doesn’t allow mail-in ballots. They didn’t buy into the big mail-in ballot situation. Wisconsin, when you look at their constitution, almost seems to not like absentee ballots. They state it’s not a right, a privilege, and they have very, very strict procedures and the strict procedure says that you can’t be given an absentee ballot, you have to personally apply for it. It’s illegal basically to solicit a vote and they have actually many reasons for it that probably goes back to their progressive days, when I say progressive, I mean late 19th century early 20th century progressive, when that really meant progressive, not retrogressive.

[28:12] So there are 60,000 ballots in Milwaukee County and 40,000 ballots in Madison that as far as we can tell and this is why we are auditing because we have very good information that numbers are going to come out about here that don’t have applications. Under the law of the State of Wisconsin, already decided, if there’s no application for an absentee ballot, the absentee ballot is thrown away. This all happened in two places in Wisconsin. Didn’t happen in Northern Wisconsin. Didn’t happen in Republican Wisconsin. Didn’t happen in neutral Wisconsin, where there are equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats, it happened in a place where the vote was 75% – 80% for the Democrat. You take away any number of those and that 20,000 lead disappears. In other words, if you count the lawful votes, Trump won Wisconsin by a good margin. Indeed, if you count the lawful votes in Pennsylvania, he won it by about 300,000 votes.

[29:23] Also in the lawsuit filed in Wisconsin which is really a petition because of their procedures, there were no inspectors provided for the count of the illegal ballots. There were numerous backdated ballots, we’re just counting them now. Run over into the 1000s and there were many precincts in which there was an overvote. Now let me explain to you what an overvote is, which is something you should have explained to the American people because it’s about the clearest circumstantial evidence of massive fraud that you can have. An overvote is if 200% of the people who are registered in a district vote. Think about that. 200% of the registered voters in a district vote. What does that mean? That means somebody voted twice, that means somebody who’s not entitled to vote voted, an illegal, a person from another city or state, a person who’s not registered, but what it means is that those are illegitimate votes. You don’t have an overvote of 200% or 300%. You don’t have an overvote of 100%. Most precincts don’t have 100% turnout. In fact, classically it’s considered to be an overvote if you go over 80%. Well in Michigan and Wisconsin, we have overvotes in numerous precincts, of 150%, 200%, and 300%.

[31:02] One of the reasons why the two Republicans did not certify in Wayne, Michigan, Wayne County, Michigan is because the overvote was so high. Monstrously high in about two-thirds of the precincts in the city of Detroit. Which means magically 2 and 3 times the number of registered voters turned out to vote. In fact we have precincts in which 2 times the number of people who live there, including children, voted. That’s absurd. The frustration of this is, what I’m describing to you is a massive fraud. It isn’t a little teeny one. It isn’t 100 votes switched here or there.

[31:52] Georgia. We’re about to file a major lawsuit in Georgia. That’ll be filed probably tomorrow. I don’t need to go through it. Virtually the same things I’ve told you before. In the City of Atlanta, Republicans were not allowed to watch the absentee mail-in ballot process. Inspections completely cast aside. And we have numerous double voters, we have numerous out-of-state voters. And we have specific evidence of intimidation and changes of vote. That will all be in the lawsuit that comes out tomorrow.

[32:30] Arizona is a state that we are looking at very, very carefully. I would say we’re probably going to bring a lawsuit in Arizona. More than probably, I think we are going to bring a lawsuit in Arizona. We’re still collecting that evidence.

[32:46] And the state that we’re looking at that would surprise you is — we have very, very significant amount of fraud allegations in the state of New Mexico, and we have a significant number of allegations in the state of Virginia. I don’t know yet whether the number in Virginia will reach a number that can turn the election.

In the states that we have indicated in red, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Arizona, we more than double the number of votes needed to overturn the election in terms of provable, illegal ballots. All you got to do to find out if I’m misleading you at all is to look at the lawsuit. Look what’s alleged, look at the affidavits, maybe we can supply more affidavits. In order to do it, I have to get permission from the people but in the materials I have here there were at least 10 that come from citizens. We have a thousand at least and we’re getting more every day.

And there are other aspects of this fraud that at this point I really can’t reveal. This is really enough. It’s enough to overturn any election. It’s disgraceful what happened and I’ll conclude by asking you to just think about this for a minute.

[34:07] What happened on the morning of November 3rd when they were going to count this new kind of ballot, this mail-in ballot? Did every Democrat leader in Pennsylvania and in Michigan and in Wisconsin and in Georgia and in Nevada and in Arizona, they all wake up and all separately have the same idea? Did they all separately have the idea that, “We are going to — We’re going to put Republican inspectors in pens, we’re not going to let them look at mail-in or absentee ballots?” They all independently come up with that, like just by coincidence. They say, “Hey, you know, we’re going to put the Republicans in pens and corrals. We’re going to do it in Pittsburgh, we’re going to do it in Philadelphia, we’re going to do it in Detroit. We’re going to do it in Milwaukee. We’re going to do it in Las Vegas. We’re going to do it in Phoenix.” What did I miss? Oh, “we’re going to do it in Atlanta.”

[35:13] Or isn’t the logical conclusion that I think any jury would accept if they heard this evidence, that somebody had this plan? Maybe that was always the plan? To do this very, very questionable form of voting, which has been criticized by President Carter, by Secretary Baker, by most experts on election reform? I think the logical conclusion is this is a common plan, a common scheme, that comes right directly from the Democrat Party and it comes from the candidate. Clearly, that’s the reason why Hillary Clinton said don’t concede even if you’re losing. That’s the reason, we had a Freudian slip by the candidate and he said he had the best voter fraud team in the country. That’s the reason why he probably didn’t have to go out and campaign. He had to have known what they were going to do. This had to be planned in advance. I’m kind of checking. Did they go to the same contractor to get the corrals to put the Republicans in?

This is a disgraceful thing that was done in this country. Probably not much more disgraceful than the things these people did in office which you didn’t and don’t bother to cover and conceal from the American people.

[36:37] But we let this happen, you know. We use largely a Venezuelan voting machine in essence to count our vote. We let this happen, we’re going to become Venezuela. We cannot let this happen to us. We cannot allow these crooks, because that’s what they are, to steal an election from the American people. They elected Donald Trump. They didn’t elect Joe Biden. Joe Biden is in the lead because of the fraudulent ballots, the illegal ballots, that were produced and that were allowed to be used, after the election was over. Give us an opportunity to prove it in court and we will.

Now I’m going to ask Sidney Powell to describe to you what we can describe about another totally outrageous situation. I don’t think most Americans know that our ballots get calculated, many of them, outside the United States and are completely open to hacking, completely open to change, and it’s being done by a company that specializes in voter fraud. I’ll let Sidney describe that to you.”

TRANSCRIPT: Sidney Powell’s Statement during Press Conference 11/19/2020

Posted in Elections, Left | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

TRANSCRIPT: Sidney Powell’s Statement during Press Conference 11/19/2020

Posted by FactReal on November 20, 2020

Overview of the evidence: The voting systems and connections to communists, Clinton Foundation, George Soros, etc.

Trump’s legal team held a press conference yesterday in D.C. They gave an overview of the evidence of massive election fraud that they have uncovered so far and that they will present in court. Below is a transcript of what Sidney Powell presented.
Full video: here.
RUSH TRANSCRIPT: SIDNEY POWELL, Nov. 19, 2020: “What we are really dealing with and uncovering more by the day is the massive influence of communist money through Venezuela, Cuba, and likely China and the interference with our elections here in the United States. The Dominion Voting Systems, Smartmatic technology software and the software that goes in other computerized voting systems as well, not just Dominion, were created in Venezuela at the direction of Hugo Chavez to make sure he never lost an election after one constitutional referendum came out the way he did not want it to come out. We have one very strong witness who has explained how it all works. His affidavit is attached to the pleadings of Lin Wood and the lawsuit he filed in Georgia. It is a stunning, detailed affidavit because he was with Hugo Chavez while he was being briefed on how it worked. He was with Hugo Chavez when he saw it operate to make sure the election came out his way. That was the express purpose for creating this software. He had seen it operate. And as soon as he saw the multiple states shut down the voting on the night of the election, he knew the same thing was happening here, that that was what had gone on. The software itself was created with so many variables and so many back doors that can be hooked up to the internet or thumb drives stuck in it or whatever, but one of its most characteristic features is its ability to flip votes. It can set an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to Vice-President Biden, which we might never have uncover had the votes for President Trump not been so overwhelming in so many of these states that it broke the algorithm that had been plugged into the system. And that’s what caused them to have to shut down in the states they shut down in. That’s when they came in the back door with all of the “mail-in ballots,” many of which they had actually fabricated some were on pristine paper with identically matching perfect circle dots for Mr. Biden. Others were shoved in, in batches. They’re always put in a certain number of batches and people would rerun the same batch.

This corresponds to our statistical evidence that shows incredible spikes in the vote counts at particular times. And that corresponds to eyewitness testimony of numerous people who have come forward and said they saw the ballots come in the back door at that time. Notably, the Dominion executives are nowhere to be found now. They are moving their offices overnight to different places. Their office in Toronto was shared with one of the Soros entities. One of the leaders of the Dominion project overall is Lord Malloch Brown, Mr. Soros’ number two person in the UK and part of his organization. There are ties of the Dominion leadership to the Clinton Foundation and to other known politicians in the country.

Just to give you a brief description of how this worked, I’m going to quote from a letter that was written and I’ll read that to make sure I get the quotes right. This person was objecting to the United States acquisition of Sequoia voting systems by Smartmatic, a foreign-owned company. I believe this transaction raises exactly the sort of foreign ownership issues that CFIUS is best positioned to examine for national security purposes. It’s undisputed that Smartmatic is foreign owned and …. acquired Sequoia. They keep changing the names as they go along. Different times when a problem comes up they just create another corporation and call it a different name. But it was a voting machine company doing business in the United States. Sequoia voting machines were used to record over 105 million votes in the 2004 presidential election in the United States. Smartmatic now acknowledges that Antonio Mugica, a Venezuelan businessman, has controlling interest in Smartmatic, but the company has not revealed who all of the Smartmatic owners are. According to the press, Smartmatic’s owners are hidden through a web of offshore private entities. And that is in fact true.

Smartmatic has been associated with the venezuelan government led by Hugo Chavez which is openly hostile to the United States, and of course as we all know, communistic and brutalizing its own people. The system has being continued there by Mr. Maduro and ensured his election.

Smartmatic’s possible connection to the Venezuelan government poses a national security concern in the context of its acquisition of Sequoia because electronic voting machines are susceptible to tampering, and insiders are in the best position to engage in such tampering.

This letter expresses concern of the Chicago 2006 primary election. And it ends by saying the products and services that are of Venezuelan origin and evaluate Smartmatic’s ownership to determine who could have influence and control over these other Sequoia products and services are important to the national security of the United States. This letter was written to Hank Paulson on October 6, 2006, by Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney. Senators Klobuchar and Warren have raised these concerns as recently as December 2019. Why our government has not taken them seriously is beyond my comprehension unless they have some of the three-letter agencies have used them themselves in other parts of the world. We know that the technology was exported to affect an election in Argentina. That’s admitted by our friend who wrote the affidavit about Hugo Chavez and his interest in Smartmatic.

Again in 2006, Carolyn Maloney wrote the Honorable John Snow, the secretary of the Treasury about the issues. Speaking of Smartmatic’s leadership, one of the Smartmatic patent holders, Eric Coomer, I believe his name is, is on the web as being recorded in a conversation with Antifa members, saying that he had the election rigged for Mr. Biden. Nothing to worry about here, and he was going to — they were going to “F” Trump. His social media is filled with hatred for the president and for the United States of America as a whole, as are the social media accounts of many other Smartmatic people.

There has been widespread use of this. Dominion itself is utilized in 2,000 jurisdictions in 30 states. It has been uncertifiable in multiple states who realized all the problems that it had including Texas. Experts have described across the board from a Princeton group of three professors to experts that we have talked to about its end user vulnerabilities. People can admittedly go in and change whatever they want. They can set the ratio of votes from one thing to another. They can say a Biden vote counts as 1.25. and a Trump vote counts as .75 and those may be the numbers that were actually used here. It’s not just the swing states that were affected. The algorithm was likely run across the country to affect the entire election. Like I said, we only discovered it this year because of the overwhelming number of votes for President Trump in the swing states that caused the machines to have to shut down for them to backfill for adding votes. We have evidence of different numbers of votes being injected into the system, the same, identical, unique six-digit number multiple times in at least two states that we’ve analyzed so far. And I’m talking about like 341,542 votes for Biden, and 100,012 for Trump. There’s no explanation, no logical explanation for the same numbers being injected 20 minutes apart into the machine. The software manual itself, you can download it from the internet. And I would encourage you all to read it because it specifically advertises some of these things as features of the system. Why it was ever allowed into this country is beyond my comprehension. And why nobody has dealt with it is absolutely appalling. The machines were easily accessible to hackers. There’s video on the net that will explain to you how a kid with a cell phone can hack one of these voting machines. There’s been no oversight of Dominion or its software. Workers in each county were trained by Dominion, but there’s no evidence of monitoring otherwise. We have testimony of different workers admitting that they were trained how to dispose of Trump votes and add to Biden votes. The software has a feature pursuant to which you can drag and drop any number of batches of votes to the candidate of your choice or simply throw them away. So, we have mathematical evidence in a number of states of massive quantities of Trump votes being trashed – just simply put in the trash like you would on your computer with any file and Biden votes being injected.

That’s in addition to flipping. I mean, it really happens in 2 ways. There’s an algorithm that runs that automatically flips all the votes and then each operator has the ability to go in, override settings. They can ignore the signature, they can ignore the top line of the ballot, they can go down ballot and select who they want to change results for. Mr. — the gentleman who founded Smartmatic, there’s video of him on the internet explaining that, yes, at least on one occasion, he admits they changed a million votes with no problem. Many of the jurisdictions that have had this problem might not have known of the issues, but many did.

And I think a full-scale criminal investigation needs to be undertaken immediately by the Department of Justice and by every state’s equivalent — attorney general’s office or state investigatory unit because there’s evidence of different benefits being provided to the people who spent $100 million of taxpayer money at the last minute for their state to get the Dominion Voting Systems put in time for this election in different ways. There’s one person that a lawyer told me got “election insurance,” meaning that he would be able to make sure he was elected. I’m sure they explained that feature in detail to many people who expressed interest in putting this voting system in. Texas denied certification of the Dominion system in 2019, but there are no doubt issues with the software that Texas did use. Unbeknownst to Texas, I would imagine, since they went to great trouble to examine the Dominion systems and reject them. But other software — the source code that does the alterations is embedded, we’ve been told, in the source code all across the country in all the voting machines.

There’s no doubt it’s been used to alter elections in other countries. We know specifically Venezuela exported it for that purpose to Argentina and other Latin American companies to make sure that the corrupt rulers who were willing to pay the highest price for being in office were allowed to rig their elections.

This is stunning, heartbreaking, infuriating, and the most unpatriotic acts I can even imagine for people in this country to have participated in, in any way, shape, or form.

And I want the American public to know right now that we will not be intimidated. American patriots are fed up with the corruption from the local level to the highest level of our government. And we are going to take this country back. We are not going to be intimidated. We are not going to back down. We are going to clean this mess up now. President Trump won by a landslide. We are going to prove it and we’re going to reclaim the United States of America for people who vote for freedom.”
– – –

TRANSCRIPT: Rudy Giuliani’s Statement during Press Conference 11/19/2020

Posted in Elections, Left | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Massive Election Fraud with Voting System & Software: Trump’s Attorney Sidney Powell

Posted by FactReal on November 16, 2020

Trump’s attorney: Massive election fraud was done with Dominion voting system and Smartmatic software.
(…developing story…more to come…)
Sidney Powell from President Trump’s legal team spoke on Sunday with Maria Bartiromo and gave more information on the machines/software used to rig the 2020 election. Powell talked about: kickbacks given to relatives of those who bought the software, how the manual explains how votes can be wiped away, how Democrats complained about this before, how the software can shift votes in real time, how Team trump have identified mathematically the exact algorithm used to modify the votes, in Michigan and Pennsylvania hundreds of thousands of votes (67% ratio for Biden, 23% for Trump) were uploaded multiple times into the system, etc.

Powell also said that President Trump won by “not just hundreds of thousands of votes but by millions of votes that were shifted by this software that was designed expressly for that purpose.” She added, “We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose.”

Other video sources: Fox News

BARTIROMO: According to public records, Dominion voting machines are used in 2,000 jurisdictions in 30 states. According to experts, if one site has a flaw, other sites are likely to as well, which is why Texas rejected using Dominion’s software three times raising concerns that the system was not safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation. That’s troubling giving we already know that at least two software glitches in Georgia and Michigan occurred on election night. Attorney Sydney Powell is leading the charge against Dominion. And she says she has enough evidence of fraud to launch a massive criminal investigation. Sydney, thanks very much for being here, we appreciate your time this morning. I want to get right into it. We just heard about the software made by SmartMatic from Rudy. I want to get your take on what you report — what you and I spoke about just a few minutes ago, and that is a gentleman named Peter Neffenger. Tell me how he fits into all of this?

POWELL: He is listed as former admiral Peter Neffenger, retired admiral Peter Neffenger. He is president and on the board of directors of Smartmatic and it just so happens he is on Mr. Biden’s presidential transition team — that’s going to be non-existent, because we’re fixing to overturn the results of the election in multiple states. And President Trump won by not just hundreds of thousands of votes but by millions of votes that were shifted by this software that was designed expressly for that purpose. We have sworn witness testimony why the software was designed. It was designed to rig elections. He was fully briefed on it. He saw it happen in other countries. It was exported internationally for profit by the people that are behind Smartmatic and Dominion. They did this on purpose. It was calculated. They’ve done it before. We have evidence from 2016 in California. We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose.

BARTIROMO: You feel that you will be able to prove this? Do you have the software in your possession? Do you have the hardware in your possession? How would you prove this, Sydney?

POWELL: I’ve got lots of ways to prove it, Maria. But I’m not going to tell on national TV what all we have. I just can’t do that.

BARTIROMO: Ok, but you have a very time — a small time frame here. The elections are supposed to be certified in early December. Do you believe that you can present this to the courts and be successful within this — just a couple of weeks.

POWELL: Well, let me put it this way. First of all, I never say anything I can’t prove. Secondly, the evidence is coming in so fast I can’t even process it all. Millions of Americans have written, I would say by now, definitely hundreds of thousands have stepped forward with their different experiences of voter fraud. But this is a massive election fraud and I’m very concerned it involved not only Dominion and its Smartmatic software, but that the software essentially was used by other election machines also. It’s the software that was the problem. Even their own manual explains how votes can be wiped away. They can put — it’s like drag-and-drop Trump votes to a separate folder and then delete that folder. It’s absolutely brazen how people bought the system and why they bought this system. In fact, every state that bought Dominion for sure should have a criminal investigation or at least a serious investigation of the — officers in the state who bought the software. We even got evidence of some kickbacks essentially.
BARTIROMO: …You said there may have been kickbacks to some people who accepted the Dominion software. Tell me what you mean.

POWELL: We are collecting evidence now from various whistleblowers that are aware of substantial sums of money being given to family members of state officials who bought the software. I mean, we are talking about $100 million dollar packages [Powell corrects this number later] for new voting machines suddenly in multiple states. Benefits ranging from financial benefits for family members to sort of, what I’d call, election insurance, because they know they can win the election if they are using that software. It’s really an insidious, corrupt system. And I can’t tell you how livid I am with our government for not paying attention to complaints even brought by Democrats: Carolyn Maloney, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar over the last several years in written letters with expert reports and some documentation of how corrupt the software is. And nobody in our government has paid any attention to it, which makes me wonder how much the CIA has used it for its own benefit in different places and why Gina Haspel is still there in the CIA is beyond my comprehension. She should be fired immediately.

BARTIROMO: Which governor or which government official accepted $100s of millions of dollars in benefits for their family as they took on this software?

POWELL: If I said $100s of millions of dollars there, I misspoke. I don’t know the exact amount of money yet, we are still collecting the evidence on that, but it’s more than one.

BARTIROMO: Okay, so you can’t say who you believe took kickbacks. What’s the CIA roll? What do you think Gina Haspel should be fired immediately? You’re saying that the CIA is behind the Dominion or Smartmatic voting software as well?

POWELL: The CIA and the FBI and other government organizations have received multiple reports of wrongdoing and failures and vulnerabilities in this company’s product. Their own manual, if you sat down and read it, would explain how and why no honest person would use this system. And it’s just not Dominion, there are other companies in the voting machine business in this country too, that may very well and are likely using the same software. We’ve detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable and aligned with these problems in other states that think they have valid systems. But the people who bought the Dominion system for sure knew exactly what they were getting. It should never have been installed anywhere. And we’re going to show the public exactly how rotten the entire state is.

BARTIROMO: I have spoked with a few whistleblowers myself this weekend. One source who is an IT specialist told me that he knows the software specifically advised people in Texas, officials in Texas not to use it and yet he was overruled. He said that there was an unusual patch that was put into the software while it was live and it’s highly unusual to put a patch in there. It’s that what you’re referring to? Tell me how it is done. And how these back-doors work.

POWELL: Okay, that’s part of it. They can stick a thumb drive in the machine or upload software to it even form the internet. They can do it from Germany or Venezuela even. They can remove-access anything. They can watch votes in real time. They can shift votes in real time. We have identified mathematically the exact algorithm they used and planned to use from the beginning to modify the votes, in this case, to make sure Biden won. That’s why he said he didn’t need your votes now, he would need your votes later. He was right, I mean, in his demented state he had no filter and he was speaking the truth more than once, including when he said he had the largest voter fraud organization ever. Well, it’s massive election fraud. It’s going to undo the entire election. They can do anything they want with the votes. They can have the machines not read the signature. They can have the machines not read the down ballot. They can make the machines read and catalog only the Biden votes. It’s like drag and drop whatever you want, wherever you want, upload votes. In fact, we’ve got math in Michigan and Pennsylvania , I think it is, that all of a sudden hundreds of thousands of votes at a 67% ratio for Biden, 23% for Trump were uploaded multiple times into the system.

BARTIROMO: You say you have an affidavit from someone who knows how the system works and was there with the planning of it. You believe you can prove this?

POWELL: Yes, oh, yes. We have a sworn — essentially a sworn statement from a witness who knew exactly how it worked from the beginning. Why it was designed to work that way and saw when things started shutting down and they started, you know, stopped counting the votes here. That was the same play that had worked in other countries.

BARTIROMO: Wow, this is explosive and we certainly will continue to follow it.

DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS 101 (2018: Dems were concerned. 2020: “Glitches” and shifting votes, etc.)

Posted in Elections, Left | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Tucker: Names of Dead People Who Voted in 2020 Election (List)

Posted by FactReal on November 11, 2020

Also How Democrats Encouraged Fraud with Unsolicited Mail-In- Ballots
Tonight, Tucker Carlson listed the names of some of the dead people who voted in last week’s presidential election. He also explained tricks Democrats used to increase the amount of fraudulent voting.

Below: List of dead “voters,” as well as video and highlights of Tucker’s report.

LIST: 2020 DEAD “Voters”
– Edward Skwiot of Trenton, Georgia, died in 2015 (Worked in construction and teaching school)
– Henry Gionta, 2012
– Norine Lucas, died 2009
– Joseph Barbano, died 2008
– Thomas Sullivan, died 2006
– George White, died in 1984
– Judy Presto, died in 2013
– Jeanne Evans, died in 2016
– Mary McArdle, died in 2010
– Steven Swartz, died in 2019
– Elizabeth Bartman, died in 2008
– Mary Weisser, died in 2012
– Walter Hoak, died in 2020
– Kristin Rehnberg, died in 2011
– John Granahan, died in 2019
– Rondall Pearson, died in 2007
– James Blalock of Covington, Georgia, died in 2006 (He was a mailman for 33 years)
– Barbara Bush, died in 2020
– Deborah Christiansen, died in 2019
– Brenda Heaton, died in 2020
– Thomas Howell, died in 2010
– Linda Kesler of Nicholson, Georgia, died in 2003
– Helen Mahdi, died in 2004
– William Nelson, died in 2020
– William Raybon, died in 2009

– Rosemary Hartle, died in 2017 (Obituary)
– Fred Stokes Jr. (of Clark County, Nevada), died in 2017 (Obituary & report)

– Denise Ondish (of Allegheny County), died on Oct. 22, 2020 (in Oct. 24, 2020, county officials mailed a ballot to her, and got it back completed on Nov. 2.


Stats: 2 million dead people on voter rolls; 24 million voter registrations invalid/incorrect
– One 2012 study by Pew found:
— There were close to 2 million dead people still on voter rolls around this country.
— Approx. 24 million voter registrations (1 out of every 8 in America) were wrong — they were no longer valid or significantly incorrect.
— Close to 3 million people in America had registrations in more than 1 state.

– Fraud was encouraged by states sending ballots and registration forms to millions of people, totally unsolicited. The pretext: COVID — a public health emergency.
– Democrats did it. Republicans let them do it.

NEVADA: (Biden currently leads Trump by fewer than 40,000 votes)
– State Democrats and their lawyers made certain Nevada sent actual ballots — not ballot applications — to every single registered voter in the state, whether they requested those ballots or not. They were aware that more than 41,000 people who are registered to vote in Nevada have not voted or updated their registrations in more than 10 years. Why? Because many of these people are dead or gone, but they got ballots anyway.

PENNSYLVANIA: Nearly 3,000 potentially deceased voters remained on the voter rolls (according to a December 2019 report from the commonwealth’s Department of the Auditor General.) The Trump campaign says it has found evidence that some of them voted this year.

Why did this happen? Democrats did it.
– Democrats understand that when you send mail-in ballots to an entire unverified voter roll, you can’t really know who is voting.

Demcrats have tried to remove all barriers to voting
– Democrats filed lawsuits in Nevada to eliminate signature verification to make certain that fraud remained likely.
– In 2019 (well before coronavirus), Democrat Senator Ron Wyden, sponsored the Vote-by-Mail Act which demands every state in the union mails ballots to their entire unverified voter list. Whether you asked for it or not, whether you are alive or not, you get a ballot. Only way to interpret this: Democrats are abetting fraud.
– In the summer, Democrats in the House of Representatives passed something called the Heroes Act: It wouldn’t simply have provided automatic mailing of absentee ballots to all voters in America. It also would have prevented states from restricting ballot harvesting (that means that anyone could collect and return bundles of ballots from dead or living voters to polling stations with no oversight all.
– In January: If Democrats gain control of the U.S. Senate, they will pass the Heroess Act into law.

Coronavirus was just a pretext – Dems have pushed for mail-in-voting for years
– Right now, Democrats are claiming universal mail-in balloting is necessary because of coronavirus, but they’re lying. They have been pushing for this very thing for years for one reason: It gives them an advantage because it increases the incidence of fraud.

Team Trump: 234 Pages of Affidavits Alleging Fraud in Michigan (Nov. 11.2020)
PA 2020 Election: Mail Ballot Appl. Approved 90 years ago…same day people were born!!
Tucker Lists Evidence of Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election
Video: Team Trump’s Legal Battle News Conf. (Nov. 9, 2020)
Trump’s Lawsuit in Pennsylvania (PDF) (2020 Election)
TIMELINE: Al Gore Conceded after 37 Days of Litigations & Recounts
LIST: 2020 Election Fraud, Irregularities

(LIST) Democrats: ‘Punish Trump Supporters!’

Posted in Elections, Left | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

PA 2020 Election: Mail Ballot Appl. Approved 90 years ago…same day people were born!!

Posted by FactReal on November 9, 2020

PENNSYLVANIA TRICKS – 2020 General Election

Mail ballot applications were approved & returned 90 years ago according to the Pennsylvania Open database…the same day those voters were born.
According to the PA database, a voter born on 07/24/1927 got his/her mail ballot application approved and returned on 07/24/1927.
Check for yourself the PA database: Pennsylvania Open Data – General Election Mail Ballot Requests.

TIP: On the database, click the column titled ‘Application Return Date’ and select ‘Sort Ascending.’

Screenshot (Nov. 9, 2020):


Mail ballot applications were approved & returned 90 years ago according to the Pennsylvania Open database…the same day those voters were born.
Example: A voter born on 07/24/1927 got his/her mail ballot application approved and returned on 07/24/1927. (Retrieved Nov. 9, 2020)

Raheem Kassam sarcastically reported:

You gotta admire these voters in Philly. So committed that they requested ballots on the day they were born, 98 years ago. And kudos to Philly government for getting them a ballot on the same day!

LIST: 2020 Election Fraud, Irregularities, Legal Cases

Posted in Elections, Left | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

(LIST) Democrats: ‘Punish Trump Supporters!’

Posted by FactReal on November 7, 2020

As the vote count continues, no winner has been declared, and legal challenges are still in court, the Democrats are anxious for vengeance. A modern Robespierre’s Reign of Terror coming? Just like any other communist dictatorship.
Their site: The Trump Accountability Project

Lies and hate being promoted by the Democrats’ Accountability Project against Trump & his supporters.

From their website, (archived here):

We should not allow the following groups of people to profit from their experience:

Those who elected him.
Individuals who worked for the Trump for President campaign, Republican National Committee, and affiliated PACs in 2016 or 2020.

Those who staffed his government.
Individuals who worked in any role as a political appointee in the Trump Administration.

Those who funded him.
Individuals who used their massive personal wealth and influence to bundle money for Trump.

We must never forget those who furthered the Trump agenda.
We should welcome in our fellow Americans with whom we differ politically.

But those who took a paycheck from the Trump Administration should not profit from their efforts to tear our democracy apart. The world should never forget those who, when faced with a decision, chose to put their money, their time, and their reputations behind separating children from their families, encouraging racism and anti-Semitism, and negligently causing the unnecessary loss of life and economic devastation from our country’s failed response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Images from their website:

FACTS: Those who are informed and sane know that:
– Obama is the one who started putting kids of illegal immigrants into cages.
– Racism comes from the Left. The Democrat Party is the party of the slavery/the KKK/confederacy.
Fascism belongs to the Left
– Trump did for Israel more than any other U.S. President.
Trump rejected racism through the years.
– Democrats called Trump ‘xenophobic’ when he installed the travel ban from China. This travel ban saved thousands of lives.
– Democrats were telling people not to be scared of coronavirus early this year.
(Nancy Pelosi in Chinatown (late Feb. 2020)
– Democrat governors forced nursing homes to take in patients with Covid. This led to thousands of deaths.

Democrat Hari Sevugan tweeted on Nov. 6, 2020:

(Sevugan is former national press secretary for the Democrat National Committee (DNC), senior spokesman for Obama’s presidential campaign, deputy campaign manager for Peter Buttigieg)

“.@kaitlancollinsjust reported WH staff are starting to look for jobs. Employers considering them should know there are consequences for hiring anyone who helped Trump attack American values. Find out how at the Trump Accountability Project.”

Alexandria Ocasio (a.k.a. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, AOC), Nov. 6, 2020:

“Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future”

CNN White House correspondent, Kaitlan Collins, Nov. 6, 2020:

“There are people in the president’s inner circle, you know, the Hope Hicks, the Dan Scavinos, those types, they are focused on dealing with the President, managing his anger, I’m told. But there are lot of other people, who are not particularly close to the President who are trying to figure out what is their next job going to be … and what is it like going into the job market – not from a normal White House where typically you got a lot of offers – but coming from the Trump White House.”

Jennifer Rubin, Nov. 6, 2020:

“Jennifer Rubin, a Washington Post columnist and Never Trumper, tweeted that anyone challenging the 2020 election results should not only be disqualified from holding public office, but ostracized from society,” reports Joel Pollak:

“Any R now promoting rejection of an election or calling to not to follow the will of voters or making baseless allegations of fraud should never serve in office, join a corporate board, find a faculty position or be accepted into “polite” society. We have a list.”

…more to come…we are sure this list will continue to grow.

Posted in Communism, Elections, Left, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »