Rallies: Trump Supporters in Atlanta, Georgia (Videos)

Via RSBN: Watch LIVE: #WalkAway FAKE NEWS Takedown at CNN HQ in Atlanta, Georgia

Watch LIVE: #StopTheSteal Protest in Atlanta, Georgia

TRANSCRIPT: Rudy Giuliani’s Statement during Press Conference 11/19/2020

WE NEED TO KNOW THE TRUTH Overview of the evidence: Thousands of Biden-only ballots were brought in truck at 4:30am and triple-counted; overvotes of 200% in some precincts; Democrat voters allowed to “cure” their defective ballots but not Republicans; in person voters found someone had previously filled absentee ballots in their name; backdated ballots; people were trained to cheat: not to look for deficiencies in ballots, not to ask for photo ID, not to check signatures, etc. All come from affidavits signed under penalty of perjury. Trump’s legal team held a press conference yesterday in D.C. They gave an overview of the evidence of massive election fraud that they have uncovered so far and that they will present in court. Below is a transcript of what Rudy Giuliani presented.

Other video sources: here.

RUSH TRANSCRIPT: RUDY GIULIANI, Nov. 19, 2020: “Well, this is representative of our legal team. We’re representing President Trump and we’re representing the Trump campaign. When I finish, Sidney Powell and then Jenna Ellis will follow me. And we will present in brief the evidence that we’ve collected over the last — I guess it is two weeks. Also, Joseph diGenova, Victoria Toensing are here with me. There are a lot more lawyers working on this, but we’re the — I guess we’re the senior lawyers. And Boris Epshteyn. So I guess the best way to describe this is, when we began our representation of the president, we certainly were confronted with a very anomalous set of results. The president way ahead on election night, seven or 800,000 in Pennsylvania, somehow he lost Pennsylvania. We have statisticians willing to testify that that’s almost statistically impossible to have happened in the period of time that it happened. But, of course, that’s just speculation. As we started investigating, both our investigations and the very patriotic and brave American citizens that have come forward are extraordinary, extraordinary number of people, extraordinary number of witnesses. And what emerged very quickly is this is not a singular voter fraud in one state. This pattern repeats itself in a number of states, almost exactly the same pattern, which to any experienced investigator, prosecutor would suggest that there was a plan from a centralized place to execute these various acts of voter fraud, specifically focused on big cities, and specifically focused on, as you would imagine, big cities controlled by Democrats. And particularly focused on big cities that have a long history of corruption. The number of voter fraud cases in Philadelphia could fill a library. Just a few weeks ago there was a conviction for voter fraud and one 2 weeks before that. And I’ve often said, I guess sarcastically, but it’s true, the only surprise I would have found in this is if Philadelphia hadn’t cheated in this election; because for the last 60 years they’ve cheated in just about every single election. You could say the same thing about Detroit. [2:39] Each one of these cities are cities that are controlled by Democrats, which means they can get away with anything they want to do. It means they have a certain degree of control over — certainly control the election board completely. And they control law enforcement and, unfortunately, they have some friendly judges that will issue ridiculously irrational opinions just to come out in their favor. So let’s start with the specifics. [3:06] Pennsylvania. In Pennsylvania, the margin of victory now for Biden, which is not a victory; it’s a fraud — is 69,140 votes. The reality is that we are now at a count of 682,770 ballots for which we have affidavits that there was no inspection of that ballot at the time that it was entered in the vote. It was a mail ballot. Mail ballots are particularly prone to fraud. We were warned about that by Jimmy Carter, President Jimmy Carter and Secretary Baker in a report about a dozen years ago in which they said that mail balloting is particularly susceptible of fraud, that we should very carefully consider ever doing it and that it can be taken advantage of. [4:05] Justice Souter warned us of the same thing in a comment in an election law case. And even the New York Times wrote articles about how dangerous mail voting, mail-in voting was. And this is the first time we ever did it en masse. And I think we proved that all three are prophets. It’s not only susceptible to fraud, it is easily susceptible to fraud, particularly if you have a plan or scheme which sounds eerily similar to what Joe Biden told us a few days before the election that he had the best voter fraud team in the world. But they were good. I don’t know that they were that good because they made significant mistakes, like all crooks do, and we caught ’em. One of them was pushing out Republican inspectors. Every state, almost every civilized country, even Tanzania and places that you wouldn’t think of have rules about inspectors, particularly for mail-in ballots. And why particularly for mail-in ballots? Because they can more easily be defrauded and you can’t check on it. [5:22] People who have never done a mail-in ballot, I’m going to show you why it is so easy. Well, you fill out an envelope like this. You put your — usually in New York, it would be your assembly district and precinct in which you’re voting. You fill out your name and your address and you sign it. You then use an inner envelope, and you put the ballot inside the inner envelope. You seal it all and you send it in. When it’s being counted, almost invariably in the United States up until the mass cheating that went on in this election, a Republican and a Democrat inspector, as well as others if there are other parties, is allowed to watch the unsealing of this ballot. It used to go on all over America when we conducted honest elections. Because the only time you can ever find out if it’s a fraudulent ballot is when it is looked at. The minute you approve this, it’s thrown away, gone for eternity. The only thing left is the vote. That could have been Mickey Mouse. That could have been a dead person. That could have been not filled out properly. That could have been the same person 30 times. And all these things have happened, by the way. That could have been nothing filled out. We’d never know. [6:54] So, for example, the recount being done in Georgia will tell us nothing because these fraudulent ballots will just be counted again because they wouldn’t supply the signatures to match the ballots. So, it means nothing to have counted these ballots, because for example, in Pennsylvania where we have probably our most precise evidence, 682,770 of these ballots were cast, put in, and they weren’t inspected, which renders them ballots that are null and void. Cannot be counted, have to be removed from the vote. Why? For several reasons, not the least of which is, that was basically only one of two places in the state where it was done. So in the other parts of the state there was a legitimate inspection of the ballots. So if you have two different standards in different parts of the state, one favoring one part of the state, the other disfavoring the other part of the state, that’s a classic violation of equal-protection clause of the United States Constitution, Bush v. Gore being the most recent case that teaches that. [8:12] That’s not the only fraud that went on in Pennsylvania. All of the other frauds carried out in the other states by the Democrat bosses happened there as well. For example, if you’ve made a mistake in that ballot and you lived in Philadelphia or in Pittsburgh, you were allowed to fix the mistake. But if you lived in what would be considered more Republican or Trump parts of the state, you were given no such right. One of our plaintiffs, Mr. Henry, cast an absentee ballot and he failed to put it in the secure envelope inside. He just put it in open, naked. That ballot was cast aside because it was invalid, because that breaks the privacy of the vote. In Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, if they noticed that there wasn’t an inner envelope, they’d contact the voter and allow ’em to vote again, or if you didn’t fill it out completely or if he made a mistake and didn’t sign his full name, he was allowed to cure it. There is no such provision under the law of Pennsylvania. The Democrat secretary of state made that up in order to maximize the votes in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh and to minimize the votes in the other parts of the state. Clearly illegal, clearly voter fraud, easily provable, hundreds of witnesses, maybe thousands. [9:55] To give you another example. We have 17,000 provisional ballots cast in Pittsburgh. Do you know what a provisional ballot is? Provisional ballot usually happens this way, and about 15 of the 17,000 happened this way. You walked in and you say, “I’m here to vote today.” “Oh, Mr. Giuliani, you already voted.” “I did? I don’t remember voting.” “Oh, yes, yes, you cast an absentee ballot.” “No, I didn’t.” “Yes, you did.” “No, I didn’t.” “Yes, you did.” So why did that happen 17,000 times in Pittsburgh? People walked in thinking — actually 15,000, to be precise. Why did it happen 15,000 times that people in Pittsburgh walked in to vote and they had already voted, according to the Democrat election machine? Did they forget? That many people with bad memories in Pittsburgh? Or is the following correct? That as witnesses will testify, they were instructed by the Democrat bosses, when they had a ballot in which there was no one registered, just assign it to somebody. Just assign it to Rudy Giuliani. And maybe Rudy Giuliani wouldn’t show up to vote. And if he does show up to vote, we’ll give him a provisional ballot. That is what we call circumstantial evidence of the fraud. The direct evidence of the fraud are the people who will testify that in fact that’s what happened to them. As well as the 50 to 60 witnesses we have for the way they were treated and not allowed to inspect the ballots. They weren’t just not allowed to do it. They were pushed. A few cases they were assaulted. In all cases they were put in a corral so far away — probably the closest they got is from here to back of that room. We could do like a — Did you all watch ‘My Cousin Vinny?’ Do you know the movie? It’s one of my favorite law movies because he comes from Brookln. And when, the nice lady who said she saw, and then he says to her, “How many fingers do I got up?” She says, “3.” Well, she was too far away to see it was only 2. These people were further away than My Cousin Vinnie was from the witness. They couldn’t see a thing. Now, I don’t know, you’re going to tell that 60 people are lying? They didn’t just tell me this. They swore under penalty of perjury which is something no Democrat has ever done. You don’t even ask Biden about this! You don’t put him under penalty of perjury. He doesn’t even get asked questions about it. He doesn’t get asked questions about all the evidence of the crimes that he committed. These people are under the penalty of perjury, their names are on an affidavit. They swear that they weren’t allowed to carry out their functions as inspectors. And it’s not just a technical thing. There is a reason they did it. Why would you not allow people to carry out the function they’ve been allowed to do for 50 years, 60 years? Why wouldn’t you allow inspections of those ballots? Because you knew you were going to use those ballots to catch Biden up. And you had a big road ahead of you. You had to catch him up for 700,000 to 800,000 votes that he was behind. And the only way you were going to do it was with the mail-in ballots. You couldn’t have a Democrat and Republican inspector around. They don’t even have Democrats watching because they’d be afraid that they’d be honest Democrats who would say, “You’re cheating!” [14:02] So, that takes us to Michigan where there was an honest Democrat who said they were cheating. And we’ll show you her affidavit because I know you keep reporting falsely that we have no evidence. That we have no specific acts of fraud. That’s because the coverage of this has been almost as dishonest as the scheme itself. The American people are entitled to know this. You don’t have a right to keep it from them. You don’t have a right to lie about it and you are. I mean, you don’t report to them that a citizen of this country, a very fine woman who is willing to allow me to give you her name. I can’t give you all these affidavits because if I do, these people will be harassed. They’ll be threatened. They may lose their job. They will lose their friends. We’ve lost lawyers in this case because they’ve been threatened. We’ve had lawyers that need protection. What’s going on in this country is horrible. And the censorship that you are imposing is making it worse. [15:14] But Jesse Jacob is an adult citizen, a resident of the state of Michigan. She’s been an employee of the city of Detroit for decades. I know her age but — she can tell you her age. She was assigned to voting duties in September and she was trained by the city of Detroit in the state of Michigan. She was basically trained to cheat. She said that, “I was instructed by my supervisor to adjust the mailing date of these absentee ballot packages to be dated earlier than when they were actually sent in. The supervisor made that announcement for all workers to engage in that fraudulent practice.” That is not me saying that. That’s just an American citizen saying that under oath. I don’t know. Maybe you could say she is lying but you can’t say there’s no evidence. This is what we call evidence. This is direct evidence, not circumstantial. I tried many, many cases as did all my colleagues here. You put a witness on a witness stand. Witness is testifying to their own knowledge. This witness goes on the witness stand and she will say, “I was told to adjust the date on the absentee ballots. I witness election workers and employees going over to the voting booth with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.” Completely illegal. She will testify to that. I don’t know. Biden’s people can cross-examine her, but you can’t just throw it away. “Gee, there’s no evidence.” Next time you say that, you’ll be lying, because there is evidence. By the way, this is public. You can all get it. It’s attached to the complaint in Costantino v. The City of Detroit. Then she “was instructed by my supervisor not to ask for a driver’s license or any photo ID when a person was trying to vote.“ Don’t ask for identification? Why would you not ask for identification? Because you knew that a lot of people not entitled to vote are gonna come in and early vote. Because you knew that illegal immigrants were gonna be allowed to vote. You knew, if you lived in Philadelphia, unless you’re stunod — that’s an Italian expression for stupid — unless you’re stupid, you knew a lot of people were coming over from Camden to vote. They do every year. Happens all the time in Philly. It’s about as frequent as getting beaten up at a Philadelphia Eagles basketball — football game. Happens all the time. All the time. [18:10] And it is allowed to happen because it is a Democrat, corrupt city. And it has been for years, many, many years. And they carried it out in places they could get away with it. They didn’t carry it out in neutral places. They didn’t carry it out in Republican places. They didn’t carry it out where the law is respected. They carry it out in corrupt — a corrupt city where the district attorney releases criminals en masse, which is why it has so much crime. [18:42] She also said, “I observed a large number of people who came to the satellite location to vote in person. But they had already applied for and submitted an absentee ballot.” So she observed a lot of people voting twice. Again, this Jesse Jacob, not me. “I was instructed not to invalidate any ballots and not to look for any deficiency in the ballots.” Why would you do that? Because you’re cheating, on purpose cheating, intentionally cheating. You’re cheating as an institution. This is an instruction from the election commissioner or the employer to the worker. “Don’t look for any deficiencies in the ballots.” “I was instructed not to look at any of the signatures on the absentee ballots.” If she was instructed not to look for any of the signatures on the absentee ballots, why the heck do you sign it in the first place? In order to identify it. She was instructed not to do that because many of the absentee ballots were fraudulent. They knew that. And they didn’t want to have account of that. [20:02] “On November 4, 2020, I was instructed to improperly pre-date the absentee ballots when the receipt date was actually after November 3rd, 2020.” Now, this is really significant because Justice Alito of the Supreme Court instructed Pennsylvania that any ballot that comes in after 8 o’clock on November 3rd, 2020, had to be put aside and not opened. Because there’s a question as to its legality and its constitutionality. What she’s telling you is that they blatantly disregarded that order, that they took ballots that were marked the 4th, and the 5th, and the 6th, and they marked it down for the 3rd in blatant disregard of the order of the United States Supreme Court. This is, this is — I don’t know if she’s a Democrat or a Republican. I assume that if she’s working, if she’s working for the — I assume if she’s working for the city of Detroit that she’s a Democrat. I assume but I may be wrong. She’s a citizen. I’ve never met her, never coached her. And I’d like you to know that it is signed under penalties of perjury. [21:25] We have 100 more of these. I can’t show them to you because those people don’t want to be harassed. They don’t want to be — have their lives torn apart by the goons on the other side. We don’t do that to them. They’ve done that to a lot of our people. They’ve done it for 4 years and it’s outrageous that it’s tolerated. And it’s tolerated because you condone it in the press, you don’t cover it, and you don’t condemn it. And it shouldn’t happen to a Republican or a Democrat. A lawyer shouldn’t have to withdraw from a case because he’s representing the President of the United States. There are many more affidavits here. I’d like to read them all, but I don’t have the time. You should have had the time and energy to go look for them. That’s your job — like it’s my job to defend the president and to represent the president. It’s your job to read these things and not falsely report that there’s no evidence. Do you know how many affidavits we have in the Michigan case? 220 affidavits. They’re not all public, but 8 of them are. Four affiants here — those are people who give affidavits — report an incident that, under any other circumstances, would have been on the front page of all your newspapers if it didn’t involve the hatred that you have, irrational, pathological hatred that you have for the president. [22:52 ] What they swear to is that at 4:30 in the morning, a truck pulled up to the Detroit center where they were counting ballots. The people thought it was food, so they all ran to the truck. Wasn’t food. It was thousands and thousands of ballots and the ballots were in garbage cans, they were in paper bags, they were in cardboard boxes, and they were taken into the center. They were put on a number of tables. At that time, they thought all the Republican inspectors had left, all but two had and an employee of Dominion who we will address a little bit later, Dominion. [23:40] Here’s what they jointly swear to, that every ballot that they could see, everything they could hear, these were ballots for Biden. When they saw a ballot, these were ballots ONLY for Biden, meaning there was no down-ticket. Just Biden. Many of them didn’t have anything on the outer envelope because these ballots were produced very quickly, very swiftly. And there are estimated to be a minimum of 60,000, maximum of 100,000. Many of them were triple-counted, which means they were put into the counting machine this way. Once, twice, three times. I didn’t see that. I don’t know that but for the fact that three American citizens are willing to swear to it. We’re not going to let them go to court and do that? We’re going to let this election go by when there are in this case 60 witnesses that can prove what I’m saying to you and other acts of fraud in Michigan? I mean, what’s happened to this country if we’re going to let that happen? What happened to this country if we’re going to cover that up? We let Al Gore carry on an election dispute longer than this one has been going on for 1 state and for chads. This happened in Pennsylvania, it happened in Michigan. Michigan probably right now, if I count up the affidavits, just one case alone, Trump v. Benson, a case that we dismissed today because that case was attempting to get the Wayne County Board of Supervisors to de-certify. Well they did. They de-certified. That case has 100 affidavits and the 100 affidavits show essentially what I’ve talked to you about. [25:42] Counting ballots improperly, counting them three and four times, having people vote three and four times, changing and backdating ballots to the point of at least 300,000 illegitimate ballots that we can specifically identify. The margin in Michigan is 146,121 and these ballots were all cast basically in Detroit that Biden won 80-20. So you see it changes the result of the election in Michigan if you take out Wayne County. So it’s a very significant case. That is being raised in the case of Costantino v. The City of Detroit. Not by us, but by an individual plaintiff. We are helping and assisting in that case however and you can find all the affidavits that you want filed in that case. You can find out they’re not just allegations, they’re allegations supported by sworn testimony which is a lot better than Joe Biden has ever done on anything. He doesn’t answer questions, much less give you sworn affidavits. [26:49] Wisconsin. Wisconsin had a very small margin, 20,544 last time I looked. In Wisconsin, without going into great detail, very similar plan. Republicans shut out in the City of Milwaukee and also in Madison. Republicans almost uniformly shut out from the absentee process. Not allowed to inspect, not allowed to look at the ballots. We have in Milwaukee and in the state of Wisconsin a much stricter law. Wisconsin doesn’t allow mail-in ballots. They didn’t buy into the big mail-in ballot situation. Wisconsin, when you look at their constitution, almost seems to not like absentee ballots. They state it’s not a right, a privilege, and they have very, very strict procedures and the strict procedure says that you can’t be given an absentee ballot, you have to personally apply for it. It’s illegal basically to solicit a vote and they have actually many reasons for it that probably goes back to their progressive days, when I say progressive, I mean late 19th century early 20th century progressive, when that really meant progressive, not retrogressive. [28:12] So there are 60,000 ballots in Milwaukee County and 40,000 ballots in Madison that as far as we can tell and this is why we are auditing because we have very good information that numbers are going to come out about here that don’t have applications. Under the law of the State of Wisconsin, already decided, if there’s no application for an absentee ballot, the absentee ballot is thrown away. This all happened in two places in Wisconsin. Didn’t happen in Northern Wisconsin. Didn’t happen in Republican Wisconsin. Didn’t happen in neutral Wisconsin, where there are equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats, it happened in a place where the vote was 75% – 80% for the Democrat. You take away any number of those and that 20,000 lead disappears. In other words, if you count the lawful votes, Trump won Wisconsin by a good margin. Indeed, if you count the lawful votes in Pennsylvania, he won it by about 300,000 votes. [29:23] Also in the lawsuit filed in Wisconsin which is really a petition because of their procedures, there were no inspectors provided for the count of the illegal ballots. There were numerous backdated ballots, we’re just counting them now. Run over into the 1000s and there were many precincts in which there was an overvote. Now let me explain to you what an overvote is, which is something you should have explained to the American people because it’s about the clearest circumstantial evidence of massive fraud that you can have. An overvote is if 200% of the people who are registered in a district vote. Think about that. 200% of the registered voters in a district vote. What does that mean? That means somebody voted twice, that means somebody who’s not entitled to vote voted, an illegal, a person from another city or state, a person who’s not registered, but what it means is that those are illegitimate votes. You don’t have an overvote of 200% or 300%. You don’t have an overvote of 100%. Most precincts don’t have 100% turnout. In fact, classically it’s considered to be an overvote if you go over 80%. Well in Michigan and Wisconsin, we have overvotes in numerous precincts, of 150%, 200%, and 300%. [31:02] One of the reasons why the two Republicans did not certify in Wayne, Michigan, Wayne County, Michigan is because the overvote was so high. Monstrously high in about two-thirds of the precincts in the city of Detroit. Which means magically 2 and 3 times the number of registered voters turned out to vote. In fact we have precincts in which 2 times the number of people who live there, including children, voted. That’s absurd. The frustration of this is, what I’m describing to you is a massive fraud. It isn’t a little teeny one. It isn’t 100 votes switched here or there. [31:52] Georgia. We’re about to file a major lawsuit in Georgia. That’ll be filed probably tomorrow. I don’t need to go through it. Virtually the same things I’ve told you before. In the City of Atlanta, Republicans were not allowed to watch the absentee mail-in ballot process. Inspections completely cast aside. And we have numerous double voters, we have numerous out-of-state voters. And we have specific evidence of intimidation and changes of vote. That will all be in the lawsuit that comes out tomorrow. [32:30] Arizona is a state that we are looking at very, very carefully. I would say we’re probably going to bring a lawsuit in Arizona. More than probably, I think we are going to bring a lawsuit in Arizona. We’re still collecting that evidence. [32:46] And the state that we’re looking at that would surprise you is — we have very, very significant amount of fraud allegations in the state of New Mexico, and we have a significant number of allegations in the state of Virginia. I don’t know yet whether the number in Virginia will reach a number that can turn the election. In the states that we have indicated in red, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Arizona, we more than double the number of votes needed to overturn the election in terms of provable, illegal ballots. All you got to do to find out if I’m misleading you at all is to look at the lawsuit. Look what’s alleged, look at the affidavits, maybe we can supply more affidavits. In order to do it, I have to get permission from the people but in the materials I have here there were at least 10 that come from citizens. We have a thousand at least and we’re getting more every day. And there are other aspects of this fraud that at this point I really can’t reveal. This is really enough. It’s enough to overturn any election. It’s disgraceful what happened and I’ll conclude by asking you to just think about this for a minute. [34:07] What happened on the morning of November 3rd when they were going to count this new kind of ballot, this mail-in ballot? Did every Democrat leader in Pennsylvania and in Michigan and in Wisconsin and in Georgia and in Nevada and in Arizona, they all wake up and all separately have the same idea? Did they all separately have the idea that, “We are going to — We’re going to put Republican inspectors in pens, we’re not going to let them look at mail-in or absentee ballots?” They all independently come up with that, like just by coincidence. They say, “Hey, you know, we’re going to put the Republicans in pens and corrals. We’re going to do it in Pittsburgh, we’re going to do it in Philadelphia, we’re going to do it in Detroit. We’re going to do it in Milwaukee. We’re going to do it in Las Vegas. We’re going to do it in Phoenix.” What did I miss? Oh, “we’re going to do it in Atlanta.” [35:13] Or isn’t the logical conclusion that I think any jury would accept if they heard this evidence, that somebody had this plan? Maybe that was always the plan? To do this very, very questionable form of voting, which has been criticized by President Carter, by Secretary Baker, by most experts on election reform? I think the logical conclusion is this is a common plan, a common scheme, that comes right directly from the Democrat Party and it comes from the candidate. Clearly, that’s the reason why Hillary Clinton said don’t concede even if you’re losing. That’s the reason, we had a Freudian slip by the candidate and he said he had the best voter fraud team in the country. That’s the reason why he probably didn’t have to go out and campaign. He had to have known what they were going to do. This had to be planned in advance. I’m kind of checking. Did they go to the same contractor to get the corrals to put the Republicans in? This is a disgraceful thing that was done in this country. Probably not much more disgraceful than the things these people did in office which you didn’t and don’t bother to cover and conceal from the American people. [36:37] But we let this happen, you know. We use largely a Venezuelan voting machine in essence to count our vote. We let this happen, we’re going to become Venezuela. We cannot let this happen to us. We cannot allow these crooks, because that’s what they are, to steal an election from the American people. They elected Donald Trump. They didn’t elect Joe Biden. Joe Biden is in the lead because of the fraudulent ballots, the illegal ballots, that were produced and that were allowed to be used, after the election was over. Give us an opportunity to prove it in court and we will. Now I’m going to ask Sidney Powell to describe to you what we can describe about another totally outrageous situation. I don’t think most Americans know that our ballots get calculated, many of them, outside the United States and are completely open to hacking, completely open to change, and it’s being done by a company that specializes in voter fraud. I’ll let Sidney describe that to you.” MORE – TRANSCRIPT: Sidney Powell’s Statement during Press Conference 11/19/2020

TRANSCRIPT: Sidney Powell’s Statement during Press Conference 11/19/2020

WE NEED TO KNOW THE TRUTH Overview of the evidence: The voting systems and connections to communists, Clinton Foundation, George Soros, etc. Trump’s legal team held a press conference yesterday in D.C. They gave an overview of the evidence of massive election fraud that they have uncovered so far and that they will present in court. Below is a transcript of what Sidney Powell presented.

Full video: here.

RUSH TRANSCRIPT: SIDNEY POWELL, Nov. 19, 2020: “What we are really dealing with and uncovering more by the day is the massive influence of communist money through Venezuela, Cuba, and likely China and the interference with our elections here in the United States. The Dominion Voting Systems, Smartmatic technology software and the software that goes in other computerized voting systems as well, not just Dominion, were created in Venezuela at the direction of Hugo Chavez to make sure he never lost an election after one constitutional referendum came out the way he did not want it to come out. We have one very strong witness who has explained how it all works. His affidavit is attached to the pleadings of Lin Wood and the lawsuit he filed in Georgia. It is a stunning, detailed affidavit because he was with Hugo Chavez while he was being briefed on how it worked. He was with Hugo Chavez when he saw it operate to make sure the election came out his way. That was the express purpose for creating this software. He had seen it operate. And as soon as he saw the multiple states shut down the voting on the night of the election, he knew the same thing was happening here, that that was what had gone on. The software itself was created with so many variables and so many back doors that can be hooked up to the internet or thumb drives stuck in it or whatever, but one of its most characteristic features is its ability to flip votes. It can set an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to Vice-President Biden, which we might never have uncover had the votes for President Trump not been so overwhelming in so many of these states that it broke the algorithm that had been plugged into the system. And that’s what caused them to have to shut down in the states they shut down in. That’s when they came in the back door with all of the “mail-in ballots,” many of which they had actually fabricated some were on pristine paper with identically matching perfect circle dots for Mr. Biden. Others were shoved in, in batches. They’re always put in a certain number of batches and people would rerun the same batch. This corresponds to our statistical evidence that shows incredible spikes in the vote counts at particular times. And that corresponds to eyewitness testimony of numerous people who have come forward and said they saw the ballots come in the back door at that time. Notably, the Dominion executives are nowhere to be found now. They are moving their offices overnight to different places. Their office in Toronto was shared with one of the Soros entities. One of the leaders of the Dominion project overall is Lord Malloch Brown, Mr. Soros’ number two person in the UK and part of his organization. There are ties of the Dominion leadership to the Clinton Foundation and to other known politicians in the country. Just to give you a brief description of how this worked, I’m going to quote from a letter that was written and I’ll read that to make sure I get the quotes right. This person was objecting to the United States acquisition of Sequoia voting systems by Smartmatic, a foreign-owned company. I believe this transaction raises exactly the sort of foreign ownership issues that CFIUS is best positioned to examine for national security purposes. It’s undisputed that Smartmatic is foreign owned and …. acquired Sequoia. They keep changing the names as they go along. Different times when a problem comes up they just create another corporation and call it a different name. But it was a voting machine company doing business in the United States. Sequoia voting machines were used to record over 105 million votes in the 2004 presidential election in the United States. Smartmatic now acknowledges that Antonio Mugica, a Venezuelan businessman, has controlling interest in Smartmatic, but the company has not revealed who all of the Smartmatic owners are. According to the press, Smartmatic’s owners are hidden through a web of offshore private entities. And that is in fact true. Smartmatic has been associated with the venezuelan government led by Hugo Chavez which is openly hostile to the United States, and of course as we all know, communistic and brutalizing its own people. The system has being continued there by Mr. Maduro and ensured his election. Smartmatic’s possible connection to the Venezuelan government poses a national security concern in the context of its acquisition of Sequoia because electronic voting machines are susceptible to tampering, and insiders are in the best position to engage in such tampering. This letter expresses concern of the Chicago 2006 primary election. And it ends by saying the products and services that are of Venezuelan origin and evaluate Smartmatic’s ownership to determine who could have influence and control over these other Sequoia products and services are important to the national security of the United States. This letter was written to Hank Paulson on October 6, 2006, by Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney. Senators Klobuchar and Warren have raised these concerns as recently as December 2019. Why our government has not taken them seriously is beyond my comprehension unless they have some of the three-letter agencies have used them themselves in other parts of the world. We know that the technology was exported to affect an election in Argentina. That’s admitted by our friend who wrote the affidavit about Hugo Chavez and his interest in Smartmatic. — Again in 2006, Carolyn Maloney wrote the Honorable John Snow, the secretary of the Treasury about the issues. Speaking of Smartmatic’s leadership, one of the Smartmatic patent holders, Eric Coomer, I believe his name is, is on the web as being recorded in a conversation with Antifa members, saying that he had the election rigged for Mr. Biden. Nothing to worry about here, and he was going to — they were going to “F” Trump. His social media is filled with hatred for the president and for the United States of America as a whole, as are the social media accounts of many other Smartmatic people. There has been widespread use of this. Dominion itself is utilized in 2,000 jurisdictions in 30 states. It has been uncertifiable in multiple states who realized all the problems that it had including Texas. Experts have described across the board from a Princeton group of three professors to experts that we have talked to about its end user vulnerabilities. People can admittedly go in and change whatever they want. They can set the ratio of votes from one thing to another. They can say a Biden vote counts as 1.25. and a Trump vote counts as .75 and those may be the numbers that were actually used here. It’s not just the swing states that were affected. The algorithm was likely run across the country to affect the entire election. Like I said, we only discovered it this year because of the overwhelming number of votes for President Trump in the swing states that caused the machines to have to shut down for them to backfill for adding votes. We have evidence of different numbers of votes being injected into the system, the same, identical, unique six-digit number multiple times in at least two states that we’ve analyzed so far. And I’m talking about like 341,542 votes for Biden, and 100,012 for Trump. There’s no explanation, no logical explanation for the same numbers being injected 20 minutes apart into the machine. The software manual itself, you can download it from the internet. And I would encourage you all to read it because it specifically advertises some of these things as features of the system. Why it was ever allowed into this country is beyond my comprehension. And why nobody has dealt with it is absolutely appalling. The machines were easily accessible to hackers. There’s video on the net that will explain to you how a kid with a cell phone can hack one of these voting machines. There’s been no oversight of Dominion or its software. Workers in each county were trained by Dominion, but there’s no evidence of monitoring otherwise. We have testimony of different workers admitting that they were trained how to dispose of Trump votes and add to Biden votes. The software has a feature pursuant to which you can drag and drop any number of batches of votes to the candidate of your choice or simply throw them away. So, we have mathematical evidence in a number of states of massive quantities of Trump votes being trashed – just simply put in the trash like you would on your computer with any file and Biden votes being injected. That’s in addition to flipping. I mean, it really happens in 2 ways. There’s an algorithm that runs that automatically flips all the votes and then each operator has the ability to go in, override settings. They can ignore the signature, they can ignore the top line of the ballot, they can go down ballot and select who they want to change results for. Mr. — the gentleman who founded Smartmatic, there’s video of him on the internet explaining that, yes, at least on one occasion, he admits they changed a million votes with no problem. Many of the jurisdictions that have had this problem might not have known of the issues, but many did. And I think a full-scale criminal investigation needs to be undertaken immediately by the Department of Justice and by every state’s equivalent — attorney general’s office or state investigatory unit because there’s evidence of different benefits being provided to the people who spent $100 million of taxpayer money at the last minute for their state to get the Dominion Voting Systems put in time for this election in different ways. There’s one person that a lawyer told me got “election insurance,” meaning that he would be able to make sure he was elected. I’m sure they explained that feature in detail to many people who expressed interest in putting this voting system in. Texas denied certification of the Dominion system in 2019, but there are no doubt issues with the software that Texas did use. Unbeknownst to Texas, I would imagine, since they went to great trouble to examine the Dominion systems and reject them. But other software — the source code that does the alterations is embedded, we’ve been told, in the source code all across the country in all the voting machines. There’s no doubt it’s been used to alter elections in other countries. We know specifically Venezuela exported it for that purpose to Argentina and other Latin American companies to make sure that the corrupt rulers who were willing to pay the highest price for being in office were allowed to rig their elections. This is stunning, heartbreaking, infuriating, and the most unpatriotic acts I can even imagine for people in this country to have participated in, in any way, shape, or form. And I want the American public to know right now that we will not be intimidated. American patriots are fed up with the corruption from the local level to the highest level of our government. And we are going to take this country back. We are not going to be intimidated. We are not going to back down. We are going to clean this mess up now. President Trump won by a landslide. We are going to prove it and we’re going to reclaim the United States of America for people who vote for freedom.” – – –

MORE – TRANSCRIPT: Rudy Giuliani’s Statement during Press Conference 11/19/2020

Trump Legal Team’s Press Conference Re: 2020 Election

Overview of Their Case The lawyers present: Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Rudy Giuliani, Joseph diGenova, Victoria Ann Toensing.

Other video sources: C-SPAN, 10 Tampa Bay Transcript: Sidney Powell’s statement.

Important News Conference today by lawyers on a very clear and viable path to victory. Pieces are very nicely falling into place. RNC at 12:00 P.M.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 19, 2020

RELATED – DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS 101 (In 2018: Dems were concerned. In 2020: “Glitches” and shifting votes, etc.)

Trump Probably Won Over 400 Electoral Votes: Trump Lawyer Lin Wood

WE NEED TO KNOW THE TRUTH Yesterday, attorney Lin Wood on Mark Levin’s radio show said: This election was a fraud. Donald Trump won, I believe, clearly a 70 percent-plus landslide election in the nation. He probably won over 400 electoral votes. So we’re uncovering step by step the layers of the onion. And we’re going to get to the truth. And the truth is, Donald Trump has been re-elected by this country to serve as president for four more years. The truth will come out. Mark 3:40 on audio below: (We recommend to listen to the whole audio, since it is something the left-wing media are not covering.) Other audio sources: Mark Levin Show (11/17/2020, Hour 1, Segment 3)

Lin Wood also spoke about the recount taking place in Georgia, the Dominion voting system and the shenanigans in the 2020 election. Mark Levin show summarized this interview: [E]steemed Attorney, and Trump Legal Team member, Lin Wood calls in to discuss his lawsuit against the State of Georgia challenging a consent agreement that was entered in by the State’s Secretary of State and the law firm Perkins Coie which has previously represented Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democrat Party. Wood is filing a motion to stop the sham recount that’s currently occurring. Wood says that the law is clear and that this election was stolen from President Trump. This is a coup disguised as an election and both Democrats and Republicans are complicit in it.

DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS 101 (2018: Dems were concerned. 2020: “Glitches” and shifting votes, etc.)

CHRONOLOGICAL REPORTS ABOUT DOMINION Years ago liberal politicians and reporters were talking about the security flaws in Dominion election technology. Today, after the 2020 general election, Dominion is known for the “glitches” (that incorrectly transferred 1000s of Trump votes to Biden) and alleged high-tech election fraud. Here is a compilation of reports about Dominion and its flaws. BEFORE 2020 ELECTION – AP: US election integrity depends on security-challenged firms (10/29/2018) A trio of companies — ES&S of Omaha, Nebraska; Dominion Voting Systems of Denver and Hart InterCivic of Austin, Texas — sell and service more than 90 percent of the machinery on which votes are cast and results tabulated. Experts say they have long skimped on security in favor of convenience, making it more difficult to detect intrusions – Bloomberg Government (4/1/2019) Dominion’s first-ever lobbying firm is Brownstein Farber Hyatt & Schreck. Nadeam Elshami, Pelosi’s former chief of staff, is one of the lobbyists on the account. – Democrat Senators’ Letter to Investors of Election Software Companies (12/6/2019) [Report, Report] In 2019, Democrats raised security concerns about Dominion. They sent letter to the investment company (Staple Street Capital Group) that had invested in Dominion Voting Systems: The Democrats were: Senators Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, Ron Wyden and Rep. Mark Pocan. We are writing to request information regarding State Street Capital Group, LLC’s (Staple Street) investment in Dominion Voting System (Dominion) one of three election technology vendors responsible for developing, manufacturing and maintaining the vast majority of voting machines and software in the United States, and to request information about your firm’s structure and finances as it relates to this company. […] We are particularly concerned that secretive and “trouble-plagued companies,” owned by private equity firms and responsible for manufacturing and maintaining voting machines and other election administration equipment, “have long skimped on security in favor of convenience,” leaving voting systems across the country “prone to security problems.” […] In the early 2000s, almost twenty vendors competed in the election technology market. Today, three large vendors — Election Systems & Software, Dominion, and Hart InterCivic — collectively provide voting machines and software that facilitate voting for over 90% of all eligible voters in the United States. […] In 2018 alone “voters in South Carolina [were] reporting machines that switched their votes after they’d inputted them, scanners [were] rejecting paper ballots in Missouri and busted machines [were] causing long lines in Indiana.” In addition, researchers recently uncovered previously undisclosed vulnerabilities in “nearly three dozen backend election systems in 10 states.” – AP: Reliability of pricey new voting machines questioned | Archive (2/23/2020) Some of the most popular ballot-marking machines, made by industry leaders Election Systems & Software and Dominion Voting Systems, register votes in bar codes that the human eye cannot decipher. That’s a problem, researchers say: Voters could end up with printouts that accurately spell out the names of the candidates they picked, but, because of a hack, the bar codes do not reflect those choices. Because the bar codes are what’s tabulated, voters would never know that their ballots benefited another candidate. […] Critics see them as vulnerable to hacking. At last year’s DefCon hacker convention in Las Vegas, it took tinkerers at the ‘Voting Village’ not even eight hours to hack two older ballot-marking devices. – NYT: Georgia Havoc Raises New Doubts on Pricey Voting Machines (By Nick Corasaniti and Stephanie Saul, 6/11/2020) In Georgia, the system’s purchase was authorized by the State Legislature in 2019 amid heavy lobbying by several vendors, including the winning bidder, Dominion Voting Systems, a Colorado-based company that is one of the nation’s largest suppliers of election systems. […] Criticisms of the systems are not unique to Dominion’s, but are aimed at the entire class of touch-screen systems known as “new generation ballot-marking devices,” which are produced by several vendors. In some cases on Tuesday, the new machines required too much extra power for aging polling locations, blowing fuses and never powering on. In others, workers who were still being trained just days before the election struggled with setup. Some polling places never even received the machines until the morning of the election. […] The electronic poll books, also new, were plagued by freezing software and user error. […] Georgia records list eight registered lobbyists for Dominion. One of them is Lewis Abit Massey, a former Georgia secretary of state who once ran for governor. Another, Jared Thomas, once served as chief of staff for Brian Kemp, the current governor. – The Atlanta Journal-Constitution: In high-stakes election, Georgia’s voting system vulnerable to cyberattack | Archive (10/23/2020) And what state officials describe as a feature of the new system actually masks a vulnerability. Officials tell voters to verify their selections on a paper ballot before feeding it into an optical scanner. But the scanner doesn’t record the text that voters see; rather, it reads an unencrypted quick response, or QR, barcode that is indecipherable to the human eye. Either by tampering with individual voting machines or by infiltrating the state’s central elections server, hackers could systematically alter the barcodes to change votes. Such a manipulation could not be detected without an audit after the election. Georgia plans to audit just one race on this year’s ballot. The new voting system “presents serious security vulnerability and operational issues” caused by “fundamental deficits and exposure,” U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg wrote in a recent order, in which she criticized state officials for not taking the problems more seriously. “These risks,” Totenberg wrote, “are neither hypothetical nor remote under the current circumstances.”

AFTER 2020 GENERAL ELECTION – GEORGIA – Spalding County: Voting Machines in Georgia County Back up After ‘Glitch’ (11/3/2020) – MICHIGAN: Dozens of Michigan Counties Used Software That Wrongfully Gave Votes to Democrats (11/6/2020) – MICHIGAN – Antrim County still red after vote tally snafu showed Joe Biden winning it (11/6/2020) – MICHIGAN – Antrim County Flips from Biden to Trump After ‘Glitch’ Fixed (11/6/2020) – MICHIGAN: ‘Glitch’ Caused 6k Michigan Ballots Meant for Republicans to Go to Democrats (11/6/2020) “Michigan Republican Party chairwoman Laura Cox..said 47 other counties used the same software that experienced this “glitch.” – GEORGIA – Gwinnett County: Another Georgia County Encounters ‘Glitch’ Causing Delay Counting 1000s of Votes (11/7/2020) – GEORGIA – Spalding & Morgan Counties Using Same Software as MICHIGAN Counties Also Encounter ‘Glitch’ (11/7/2020)

MI uses Dominion's Democracy Suite's voting software to tally votes. According to a brochure for the company, MI is ranked 1 of its major vendors. 48 counties, according to @MIGOP, use this software. Notice where else it's used? Key battlegrounds: NV, AZ, MN, WI, MI, FL, GA, FL. pic.twitter.com/GaHtWGh1Y2

— Beth Baumann (@eb454) November 7, 2020

– Sidney Powell: People with links to powerful Democrats using Dominion voting machines to ‘steal’ votes (11/8/2020) Powell during a Fox News interview by host Maria Bartiromo said: – – Nadeam Elshami, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s former chief of staff who last year became a lobbyist for Dominion, and – – Richard Blum, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s husband, who she said is a significant shareholder in the company. – Sydney Powell with Bartiromo (11/8/2020)

Sidney Powell is a national treasure. Thank you for fighting @SidneyPowell1! pic.twitter.com/kpo1wOtsqr

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) November 8, 2020

– Researchers Question Reliability of Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software (11/8/2020) – Software that incorrectly gave Biden thousands of Michigan votes used in 28 other states (11/9/2020) – Officials raised concerns for years about security of US voting machines, software systems (11/9/2020) – – Dominion Voting Systems…was rejected three times by data communications experts from the Texas Secretary of State and Attorney General’s Office for failing to meet basic security standards. – – – Texas Rejection Letter – – – Texas Analysis of Dominion Flaws (Hat tip) – – Dominion Voting Systems, a Canadian company headquartered in Denver, is one of three companies primarily used in U.S. elections. The others are Election Systems and Software and Texas based-Hart InterCivic. – – One subsidiary is Smartmatic – – SOROS CONNECTION: Smartmatic’s chairman is a member of the British House of Lords, Mark Malloch Brown, a former vice-chairman of George Soros’ Investment Funds, former vice-president at the World Bank, …. – Dominion Vote System That Flipped Trump Votes To Biden Was Flagged As ‘Fragile And Error Prone’ In 2019 [Texas] (11/10/2020) – Dominion Voting Systems Retains Obama ‘Vote Protection Director’ As Lobbyist (11/11/2020) – – OBAMA CONNECTION: Brian McKeon, a lobbyist for Dominion Voting Systems, was a Voter Protection Director for Obama’s 2012 campaign.[Lobbyist Info] – 96% Of Dominion Voting Systems Political Donations Went To Democrats (11/12/2020) – Sidney Powell: Massive Election Fraud with Voting System & Software (11/15/2020)