FactReal

QUICK FACTS: Politics, News, Economy, Religion, History…for busy people!

Archive for the ‘Law’ Category

Trump Probably Won Over 400 Electoral Votes: Trump Lawyer Lin Wood

Posted by FactReal on November 18, 2020

WE NEED TO KNOW THE TRUTH
Yesterday, attorney Lin Wood on Mark Levin’s radio show said:

This election was a fraud. Donald Trump won, I believe, clearly a 70 percent-plus landslide election in the nation. He probably won over 400 electoral votes.

So we’re uncovering step by step the layers of the onion. And we’re going to get to the truth. And the truth is, Donald Trump has been re-elected by this country to serve as president for four more years. The truth will come out.

Mark 3:40 on audio below:
(We recommend to listen to the whole audio, since it is something the left-wing media are not covering.)

Other audio sources: Mark Levin Show (11/17/2020, Hour 1, Segment 3)

Lin Wood also spoke about the recount taking place in Georgia, the Dominion voting system and the shenanigans in the 2020 election.

Mark Levin show summarized this interview:

[E]steemed Attorney, and Trump Legal Team member, Lin Wood calls in to discuss his lawsuit against the State of Georgia challenging a consent agreement that was entered in by the State’s Secretary of State and the law firm Perkins Coie which has previously represented Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democrat Party. Wood is filing a motion to stop the sham recount that’s currently occurring. Wood says that the law is clear and that this election was stolen from President Trump. This is a coup disguised as an election and both Democrats and Republicans are complicit in it.

Posted in Elections, Law | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Liberal Media: Biden is NOT President-elect

Posted by FactReal on November 15, 2020

Kernels of truth are sometimes hiding within reports from the liberal media (which have been aggressively pushing the fiction of “President-elect Biden” and his parallel presidency for a week.)
QUICKFACTS from liberal media: Biden is NOT President-elect

President-elect is a descriptive term not an official office. As such, Biden has no power in the government, and he would not until he is inaugurated at noon on January 20, 2021. (VOA News, 11/9/2020)

The U.S. election won’t be officially certified for weeks. In the meantime, court challenges and state recounts could occur. (VOA News, 11/9/2020)

Once states have certified the vote, pledged electors then cast their votes in the Electoral College in mid-December. (VOA News, 11/9/2020)

Congress then certifies the overall Electoral College result in early January[.] (VOA News, 11/9/2020)

The Electoral College actually chooses the president under the U.S. Constitution[.] (AP, 11/11/2020)

Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani … pointed out that media has no official role in deciding who becomes the U.S. president. That’s true. (AP, 11/11/2020)

Many people assume the winner of the U.S. presidential contest is determined once the media calls the race and the losing candidate delivers a concession speech. But the truth is that formally declaring a presidential winner is a months-long process that won’t be completed until January. (VOA News, 10/12/2020)

The electors then meet in their state capitals … to formally cast their votes for president and vice president. […] This year, that date falls on Dec. 14. (VOA News, 10/12/2020)

[O]n Jan. 6, 2021, when Congress meets to count the electoral votes and officially certify the winner. (VOA News, 10/12/2020)

BidenisNOT-PRESIDENT-ELECT(2020Election)
QUICK TIMELINE TO CERTIFY A PRESIDENTIAL WINNER:
Main Dates:
– Dec. 14: Electors vote in their States and certify the winner.
– Jan. 6: Congress counts & certifies the electoral votes.

November 3, 2020: General Election Day
November 4 – Dec. 14, 2020: Counting Popular Votes and Filing Certificates of Ascertainment
December 8, 2020: States resolve controversies (a.k.a. The “Safe Harbor” Deadline)
December 14, 2020: Electors meet in their states to formally cast their votes for president and vice president.
December 23, 2020: Electoral votes must be received by the Senate & the Archivist
By January 3, 2021: Archivist transfers Certificates to Congress
January 6, 2021: Congress counts the electoral votes & declares election results.
They certify the winner of the election.
January 20, 2021 at Noon: Presidential Inauguration Day

Sources:
Archives.gov: Electoral College Electoral College Timeline of Events
Congressional Research Service Reports (PDF): “The Electoral College: A 2020 Presidential Election Timeline” (Updated October 22, 2020)

MARK LEVIN: “BIDEN’S “PRESIDENT-ELECT” DECLARATIONS ARE TRULY THE STUFF OF A TYRANT” (11/11/2020)

Mark Levin Show:

We DO NOT have two presidents at the same time. Biden’s boorish conduct, holding policy press conferences, attending official events, discussing foreign policy with heads’ of state, etc., is truly appalling. And the media are encouraging this, of course. Biden has no respect for the constitutional system, and it is HE is an embarrassment and defying the constitution and the law. The electoral process — with state canvassing, recounts, and litigation — is not over. It takes more than 8 days. And the serious issues are ubiquitous due, in part, to the premeditated pre-November 3 litigation strategies of the Biden campaign, the Democrat Party, and their surrogates in over 300 lawsuits they brought to change the rules and weaken election safeguards. Biden’s “president-elect” declarations are truly the stuff of a tyrant. God forbid, should he become president, it is clear he will govern the same way as it is the way of the radical Left. While this is an uphill fight, it is a fight that MUST go forward!

SOURCES

NEWS REPORTS
The liberal VOA News’ column (on their margin), “What It Means to Become President-Elect in the US?” (Emphasis= kernels of truth)

In the United States, Democrat Joe Biden is being called the president-elect.

President-elect is a descriptive term not an official office. As such, Biden has no power in the government, and he would not until he is inaugurated at noon on January 20, 2021. […]

When will the dispute be resolved?

The U.S. election won’t be officially certified for weeks. In the meantime, court challenges and state recounts could occur. […]

Once states have certified the vote, pledged electors then cast their votes in the Electoral College in mid-December. Congress then certifies the overall Electoral College result in early January, about two weeks before Inauguration Day.

Even the leftist Associated Press agrees that the media has no official role in deciding who becomes the U.S. president, 11/11/2020: (Emphasis= kernels of truth)

The Electoral College actually chooses the president under the U.S. Constitution, acting in a process that starts with the popular vote across the republic. But its work takes weeks. In that strange vacuum created by a federalist system and worsened — in the 1800s — by the slow counting and communicating of returns, news organizations emerged as major players in first, collecting and adding together the vote from each state’s election officials around the country, then announcing the victor based on that vote count.

[…]

Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani … when he learned the AP and other networks had called the race for Biden. He pointed out that media has no official role in deciding who becomes the U.S. president.

That’s true.

The VOA News also explained on October 12, 2020, their column titled: “Who Declares Winner in US Presidential Election, 10/12/2020″ (Emphasis = kernels of truth)

Many people assume the winner of the U.S. presidential contest is determined once the media calls the race and the losing candidate delivers a concession speech. But the truth is that formally declaring a presidential winner is a months-long process that won’t be completed until January.

That process essentially involves Americans voting for electors, the electors voting for the president, and then Congress declaring the winner. […]

Once the 50 states, plus the District of Columbia, tally the in-person, mail-in and provisional ballots, each state governor draws up a list of electors. Copies of this list, known as the Certificate of Ascertainment, are submitted to the U.S. Archivist, the head of the National Archives.

The electors then meet in their state capitals — the District of Columbia’s meet in D.C. — to formally cast their votes for president and vice president. […] This year, that date falls on Dec. 14.

The electors in each of the states complete Certificates of Vote and send them to the U.S. Senate, the National Archives and state officials. […]

The final step in the process occurs on Jan. 6, 2021, when Congress meets to count the electoral votes and officially certify the winner.

Posted in Elections, History/ Heritage, Law | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

STATUS: Trump’s Lawsuits (2020 Election)

Posted by FactReal on November 14, 2020

Update on Trump campaign’s election legal challenges

CoveredWindowsBallotCountingDetroitTCF2020

Election officials ordered windows to be covered at the TCF Center in Detroit, Michigan, while ballots were being counted inside.
(Nov. 4, 2020)

NEWS ROUNDUP
TWITCHY: Trump campaign drops lawsuit in Arizona, loses judicial rulings in Michigan and Pennsylvania (11/13/2020)
PJ MEDIA: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin: Here’s an Update on Team Trump’s Lawsuits and Recounts (11/12/2020)

Posted in Elections, Law, Trump | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

PDF: Trump’s Michigan Lawsuit + 234 Pages Affidavits Re: Voting Fraud & Intimidation

Posted by FactReal on November 13, 2020

Here is the PDF of Team Trump’s lawsuit filed this week in Michigan. It includes 234 pages of affidavits from witnesses alleging fraud and harassment in Wayne County, Michigan, as we reported yesterday.

PDF source: DonaldJTrump.com | Archive

Press Release on Nov. 11, 2020:

President Trump’s re-election campaign today filed a federal lawsuit in Michigan citing multiple witness accounts of irregularities, incompetence, and unlawful vote counting. The suit relies on affidavits from witnesses who say they saw election officials counting ineligible ballots, counting batches of the same ballots multiple times, counting illegal late ballots and pre-dating them, accepting ballots deposited in drop boxes after the deadline, and duplicating ballots illegally. It also documents how defendant Wayne County used faulty ballot tabulators that miscounted votes for President Trump as votes for the Biden-Harris ticket.

The complaint also documents illegal and official intimidation and interference with lawful election challengers, harassment of Republican challengers tolerated or perpetrated by election officials, and arbitrary and unequal treatment of Republican challengers. Multiple witnesses gave alarming reports of fraud, intimidation, and interference, such as seeing about 50 ballots being fed multiple times into a ballot scanner, provisional ballots being placed in a tabulation box, ballots received after Election Day being pre-dated and counted, and officials in Wayne County covering windows of the counting center to prevent observers from lawfully monitoring the ballot counting process.

“The 70 million Americans who voted for President Trump deserve transparency into the potentially unconstitutional conduct documented here. The numerous reports we have heard from credible witnesses of Michigan’s election processes are alarming. Every American should have faith in our electoral process and know that their legal vote was both counted and protected. Unfortunately, based on several witnesses’ accounts, that seemingly is not what occurred in the state of Michigan,” said Matt Morgan, Trump 2020 campaign general counsel. “As we have said from the beginning, our campaign will continue to ensure all Americans can trust in a free and fair election, and this lawsuit is a noteworthy step toward achieving that goal.”

The federal suit was filed in the Western District of Michigan against Wayne County and the Michigan Secretary of State on behalf of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and individual Michigan citizens and voters seeking declaratory and emergency injunctive relief. With this lawsuit, we seek to stop certification of Michigan election results until defendants have verified and confirmed ballots were cast and tabulated in accord with the law and to ensure no unlawful ballots were cast.

Lawsuit

Exhibit

RELATED:
Team Trump: 234 Pages of Affidavits Alleging Fraud in Michigan (Nov. 11.2020)
Affidavits: Harassment against GOP Poll Watchers in Michigan (2020 Election)

MORE:
Tucker: Names of Dead People Who Voted in 2020 Election
Tucker Lists Evidence of Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election
PA 2020 Election: Mail Ballot Appl. Approved 90 years ago…same day people were born!!
TIMELINE: Al Gore Conceded after 37 Days of Litigations & Recounts
LIST: 2020 Election Fraud, Irregularities
(LIST) Democrats: ‘Punish Trump Supporters!’

Posted in Elections, Law, Trump | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Why Broward Sheriff Allowed Failed Cop to Get $105K Pension and Defended Obama’s Leniency “Promise” Program

Posted by FactReal on January 8, 2019

TAXPAYERS FINANCING FAILED POLICIES AND FAILED PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
Via Tucker Carlson (1/4/2019): Did Parkland Cop Protect Sheriff Scott Israel’s Son?
From video:

– Did Deputy Scot Peterson, who failed to stop the Parkland school shooting in 2018, covered up an alleged sexual assault involving the son of Broward Sheriff Scott Israel?
– Sheriff Israel did not fire Deputy Scot Peterson.
– Peterson was allowed to keep his $105,000 a year pension (plus health-care benefits) paid by taxpayers…for the rest of his life!
– Obama’s “Promise” Program (a school policy to report fewer arrests, suspensions) and the Parkland school shooting.

[PROMISE Program (Preventing Recidivism through Opportunities, Mentoring, Interventions, Support, and Education).]

Via Real Clear Investigations (RCI), Fla.: The Sheriff, the Sheriff’s Son, and the ‘Coward of Broward’ (1/3/2019):

Parents of children gunned down in the Parkland school shooting in Florida last year have never understood two actions taken by Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel: his refusal to fire a campus-based deputy who failed to enter the school during the rampage that took 17 lives, and his continued defense of controversial Obama-era school policies that allowed the  accused shooter, Nikolas Cruz, to avoid arrest and a police record and thereby purchase the murder weapon.

Some now think they have found the answer in a single incident that occurred in 2014. A police report shows that’s when Israel’s then-17-year-old son, Brett, was accused of participating in a sexual assault of a 14-year-old boy at Marjory Stoneman Douglas  High School.

The case was investigated by Scot Peterson — the armed deputy who took cover while children and staff were shot last February. Using the Obama-era guidelines, Peterson’s recommendation helped his boss’s son receive just a three-day suspension.[…]

While Israel publicly criticized Peterson for inaction during the shooting, he didn’t fire his deputy, instead letting him resign and  receive a public pension of almost $105,000 a year (not including health-care benefits). The 55-year-old Peterson will collect  monthly payments of more than $8,700 for the rest of his life.[…]

Parkland parents and their lawyers believe one reason for Sheriff Israel’s continued defense of a controversial no-arrest pact he signed with Broward County Public Schools to divert offenders from jail to counseling is that his son benefited from the  lenient policy.

The 2013 agreement, known generally as the PROMISE program, was designed to reduce school-based arrests for minor  offenses and stop the so-called “school-to-prison pipeline” disproportionately affecting minorities.

[…]

In 2013, Israel jointly developed the no-arrest PROMISE program with Broward County Public Schools Superintendent Robert Runcie as part of a crusade first launched in 2011 by the Obama administration to end disproportionate arrests and suspensions of minority students. It required school districts to report data on discipline disparities by race and close racial gaps in suspensions and arrests. The national policy, known as the Supportive School Discipline Initiative, was announced in July 2011 by then-Education Secretary Arne Duncan, Runcie’s former boss and longtime mentor. Three months later, on Duncan’s recommendation, Runcie was hired by the Broward school board. Records show Runcie met with Obama officials in the White House as he put the policy into practice at the largest school district in the country.

As Runcie pioneered the most lenient discipline policies in the nation, the [Obama] administration pumped millions of dollars in education grants into his district. More than 50 other large school districts adopted similar programs as the administration opened race-bias investigations and threatened funding cuts for those who failed to comply with the lower disciplinary standards.[…]

The Florida state safety commission’s draft report also revealed that the Broward district has been systematically underreporting crimes committed on campus since revising its  discipline policies, helping it appear that the PROMISE program and its required “restorative justice” counseling  sessions were  working to reduce the number of students who reoffend and control overall crime on campus.

Officials at Stoneman Douglas, for example, failed to report  dozens of instances of violence, bullying, theft, robbery and trespassing in the  2016-2017 school year, making the school look much safer than it was prior to the shooting.[…]

The sheriff even mirrored the no-arrest policy at the county jail.

In a related  program, Israel agreed to back off arrests of students who commit various crimes outside of schools, offering them civil citations and the same “restorative justice” counseling in lieu of incarceration, even for repeat offenders. Restorative justice is a controversial alternative punishment in which delinquents gather in “healing circles” with counselors – and sometimes even the victims of their crime – and  discuss their feelings and the “root causes” of their anger and actions.

Within two years of adopting the discipline reforms, Broward’s juvenile recidivism rate surged higher than the Florida state average.  The negative trends continued through 2017, the most recent juvenile  crime data show.

Posted in Economy/ Finance, Law, Left, Obama, USA-Florida | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Logan Act Used as Pretext to Investigate Flynn (READ: Court Docs)

Posted by FactReal on December 18, 2018

12/4/2018: FLYNN’S SENTENCING MEMO CITED THE ‘LOGAN ACT’…BUT IT DOES NOT APPLY TO THE PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION TEAM

Summary:
* Under this dormant 218-year old statute no one has ever been convicted.
* It prohibits private citizens from interfering in diplomatic disputes with foreign governments
* But it does not apply to members of presidential transition teams.
* Lawyers, judges, and constitutional scholars regard the law as unconstitutional.
* Every president-elect has his transition members engage with foreign governments to prepare for the challenges that lay ahead.
* Yet Democrats seized on the Logan Act at the end of the Obama administration as a pretext to investigate the Trump team, and to interview Flynn on Jan. 24, 2017.

[Also see: Nothing Wrong with Flynn Talking to Russia during Transition]

READ THE COURT DOCUMENT: (Mueller’s Sentencing Memo for Flynn)
Name: GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN AID OF SENTENCING
Case 1:17-cr-00232-EGS Document 46 Filed 12/04/18
PDF: Justice Department | Scribd | Google

REPORT: Prosecutors recommend no jail for Trump’s ex-national security adviser Michael Flynn
Via CBS: (12/4/2018)

Special counsel Robert Mueller filed a sentencing memo Tuesday night [12/4/2018] suggesting that Michael Flynn has given the government “substantial assistance,” and it recommends that Flynn serve no time for making a false statement to the FBI. The sentencing guidelines for Flynn’s offense suggest zero to six months of incarceration. […]

Flynn met with the special counsel 19 times as part of his agreement to cooperate with the government in its investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. According to the filing, Flynn has been cooperating in “several ongoing investigations.”

ANALYSIS: Logan Act used as pretext to investigate Trump team:
From Kimberley A. Strassel‘s article, ‘Mueller’s Gift to Obama’: (12/6/2018)

The Flynn sentencing document, meanwhile, contained yet another outrageous gift to Obama alumni. In laying out the “serious” nature of Mr. Flynn’s crimes, the document asserts that one of the questions about the Flynn-Kislyak discussion was whether “the defendant’s actions violated the Logan Act,” a 1799 statute that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments that are in dispute with the U.S.

Only two defendants have ever been charged under the Logan Act, the more recent one in 1852, and neither was convicted. It is normal for members of a presidential transition team to talk to their foreign counterparts, and on all manner of subjects. Yet Democrats seized on the Logan Act in the waning days of the Obama administration as a pretext to investigate the Trump team, and to intervene in the Flynn case. It was on Logan Act grounds that then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates dispatched FBI agents to interview Mr. Flynn on Jan. 24, 2017—the interview now central to Mr. Mueller’s charge that he lied to investigators.

It’s hard to overstate how unserious the Logan Act claim is. If Mr. Mueller has no case to make that Mr. Flynn violated the Logan Act, he has no business bringing it up. The only conceivable reason to throw it in was to give cover to the Obama officials who used it as their excuse to target Mr. Flynn in the first place, which they then used to help justify the appointment of a special counsel.

ANALYSIS: Logan Act doesn’t apply to presidential transition members like Flynn:
From Gregg Jarrett ‘s article headlined, ‘Mueller strikes out trying to nail Trump – Flynn sentencing memo is a big nothing’: (12/5/2018)

[T]he Logan Act, which prohibits private citizens from interfering in diplomatic disputes with foreign governments… Lawyers, judges, and constitutional scholars regard the law as unconstitutional.

Nevertheless, this long dormant law does not apply to members of presidential transition teams who are acting not as private citizens, but as incoming government representatives of the person about to assume the presidency. They would therefore be constitutionally authorized to conduct foreign affairs. Every president-elect has his transition members engage with foreign governments to prepare for the challenges that lay ahead.

Not even Mueller would be foolish enough to bring a case under the Logan Act, especially since Flynn did not interfere in a diplomatic dispute under the meaning of the act. To the contrary, Flynn sought ways to de-escalate tensions over U.S. sanctions President Obama imposed on Russia by asking the Russian government to limit its response “in a reciprocal manner.”

By doing this, Flynn was acting for the benefit of the U.S. government and in a manner not inconsistent with the Obama administration’s wishes and policy.

ANALYSIS: Israel Claim Does Not Fall under Logan Act:
Gregg Jarrett: also clarified: (12/5/2018)

Flynn’s other contact with Russia, also referenced in the court documents, dealt with a United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements on the West Bank. However, this, too, would not fall under the Logan Act, since the U.S. took no position on the U.N. resolution. By abstaining, it neither supported the resolution nor opposed it.

And since the U.N. measure imposed no sanctions, it was nothing more than an idle diplomatic statement. Flynn, or anyone else in the incoming Trump administration, can hardly be accused of interfering.

RELATED
Nothing Wrong with Flynn Talking to Russia during Transition
Flynn Targeted for Destruction? He Opposed Obama Policies
Crimes Against Flynn Ignored by Mueller
Comey: “I Sent FBI to Flynn, Broke Protocol and Got Away with It” (Video)

Posted in Law, Left, Obama, Trump | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »