Democrat NY Gov. Hochul: Young Black Kids in the Bronx Don’t Know What the Word ‘Computer’ Is (Video)

Video: “Young black kids growing up in the Bronx who don’t even know what the word ‘computer’ is,” – New York Governor Kathy Hochul, saying something that would get a Republican instantly cancelled, but it’s (D)ifferent. “Young black kids growing up in the Bronx who don’t even know what the word ‘computer’ is,” – New York Governor Kathy Hochul, saying something that would get a Republican instantly cancelled, but it’s (D)ifferent. pic.twitter.com/zcntbt8fKg — Kevin Dalton (@TheKevinDalton) May 7, 2024

###

This post might be updated later on.

READ: Democrat’s Proposed Bill to Take Away Trump’s Secret Service Protection Once Trump is Convicted

DEMOCRATS REVEAL THE NEXT STEP OF THEIR PLAN ‘DESTROY AMERICA FIRST’ Democrat Rep. Bennie Thompson (Mississippi), who lied while being the chairman of the January 6 committee, introduced this week a bill to take strip Trump’s Secret Service protection once Trump is convicted. This comes now that the New York trial is underway in a county that voted 86% against Trump.

READ THE PROPOSED BILL PDF: The Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable (DISGRACED) Former Protectees Act (Archive)

Who is Bennie Thompson? – As Jan 6 Chairman LIED when he said J6 rioters killed police officers – Did not attend Trump’s Inauguration in 2017 – Did NOT Oppose Riots in 1992 & was Offended when Asked to Take a Stand Against Riots – Called to Defund the Police (Video mark 2:09)

Democrat Bennie Thompson’s Statement The Democrats’ Homeland Security Committee posted on X/Twitter: (April 19, 2024) JUST IN: Congressman @BennieGThompson introduced legislation to ensure no Secret Service protection for convicted felons sentenced to prison. THOMPSON: [emphasis added] Unfortunately, current law doesn’t anticipate how Secret Service protection would impact the felony prison sentence of a protectee – even a former President. It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality. Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment– and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them. JUST IN: Congressman @BennieGThompson introduced legislation to ensure no Secret Service protection for convicted felons sentenced to prison. READ MORE HERE: https://t.co/pwSYtd5sVN pic.twitter.com/1N65BHk5yQ — House Homeland Security Committee Democrats (@HomelandDems) April 19, 2024 —

TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROPOSED BILL 118TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. To terminate United States Secret Service protection for felons. ___________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on ___________________ ___________________ A BILL To terminate United States Secret Service protection for felons. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act’’ or the ‘‘DISGRACED Former Protectees Act’’. SEC. 2. DENYING CERTAIN FELONS SECRET SERVICE PROTECTION. Section 3056(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘declined.’’ and inserting ‘‘declined. The protection authorized in paragraphs (1) through (8) shall terminate for any person upon sentencing following conviction for a Federal or State offense that is punishable for a term of imprisonment of at least one year.’’.

REPORT Arizona criminal lawyer, Robert Gouveia, talked about this on his podcast: …STRIP Secret Service Protection? (April 19, 2024) Democrats are now trying to remove Trump’s Secret Service protection so they can imprison him. #Trump #Trial #SecretService

###

This post might be updated later on.

Like Trump, Dem. Al Gore Tried to Find Votes, Proposed ‘Fake’ Electors, Filed Lawsuits in 2000

Article from Lawyer who Represented Democrat Al Gore during his Election Objections in 2000 Al Gore’s lawyer and Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz wrote in the Daily Mail last week: ALAN DERSHOWITZ: Al Gore, his legal team and I tried to find uncounted presidential votes, lobbied officials and fought in the courts in 2000. The only difference now? The candidate’s name is Donald Trump… That’s why this prosecution is an outrage | Archive: (8/16/2023) [Emphasis added] Electoral challenges have long been part of American history. Only now are they being criminalized. I was one of the lawyers involved in objections to Florida’s presidential vote in 2000. (…) No one was indicted, disbarred, disciplined or even much criticized for those efforts, yet here we stand today. (…) Should Al Gore have been charged in 2000? What about me? (…) During the course of our challenges, many tactics similar to those employed in 2020 were attempted. Lawyers wrote legal memoranda outlining possible courses of conduct, including proposing a slate of alternate electors, who would deliver our preferred election results to Congress. (…) Now, Trump and his attorney Rudy Giuliani, along with others, are accused of conspiracy to commit forgery and false statements for drafting their list of alternate electors. In 2000, Florida state officials were lobbied to secure recounts in selected counties in which we thought the tally would favor us. We were trying to find at least 600 votes that would change the result. This new indictment features Trump’s phone call with Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, which was captured in an audio recording. In the conversation, Trump asks Raffensperger to ‘find’ 12,000 votes. In my mind, this [Trump’s Georgia] call is among the most exculpatory pieces of evidence. Trump was entitled as a candidate to ask a Georgia state official to locate votes that he believes were not counted. In 2000, attempts were made to influence various Florida officials to recount the votes. Now, the former president’s request that Georgia’s Republican Speaker of the House reconsider the count is being charged as soliciting a public official to violate his oath. But if similar behavior was legal in 2000, how could it be illegal in 2023? (…) The First Amendment and general criminal law principles protect the right to be wrong, especially if that right is based on an honest mistake or belief. Read the full article here.

Rep. Byron Donalds tweeted Dershowitz’ article: 👇🏿👇🏿 ALAN DERSHOWITZ: Al Gore, his legal team and I tried to find uncounted presidential votes, lobbied officials and fought in the courts in 2000. The only difference now? The candidate's name is Donald Trump… That's why this prosecution is an outrage. https://t.co/T3ObPQjaA2 — Byron Donalds (@ByronDonalds) August 18, 2023

This post might be updated later on.

Levin: These Democrats Challenged Republican Elections; Nobody was Charged (Podcast, 8/15/2023)

What Democrats are doing is a Revolution with the Purpose of Destroying the Republican Party Podcast recap 1: The Durham report lays out that Hillary Clinton, the Democrat party, their lawyers, and the Obama administration interfered with the election of 2016 to try and stop Donald Trump from being elected and nobody was charged. Audio via: Mark Levin Show / YouTube and Rumble

Levin read from the Durham Report | Archive: [Page 17] Conclusion Based on the review of Crossfire Hurricane and related intelligence activities, we conclude that the Department and the FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law in connection with certain events and activities described in this report. As noted, former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith committed a criminal offense by fabricating language in an email that was material to the FBI obtaining a FISA surveillance order. In other instances, FBI personnel working on that same FISA application displayed, at best, a cavalier attitude towards accuracy and completeness. FBI personnel also repeatedly disregarded important requirements when they continued to seek renewals of that FISA surveillance while acknowledging – both then and in hindsight – that they did not genuinely believe there was probable cause to believe that the target was knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of a foreign power, or knowingly helping another person in such activities. [ ] And certain personnel disregarded significant exculpatory information that should have prompted investigative restraint and re-examination. Our investigation also revealed that senior FBI personnel displayed a serious lack of analytical rigor towards the information that they received, especially information received from politically affiliated persons and entities. This information in part triggered and sustained Crossfire Hurricane and contributed to the subsequent need for Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation. In particular, there was significant reliance on investigative leads provided or funded (directly or indirectly) by Trump’s political opponents. The Department did not adequately examine or question these materials and the motivations of those providing them, even when at about the same time the Director of the FBI and others learned of significant and potentially contrary intelligence. Page 303: Throughout the duration of Crossfire Hurricane, facts and circumstances that were inconsistent with the premise that Trump and/or persons associated with the Trump campaign were involved in a collusive or conspiratorial relationship with the Russian government were ignored or simply assessed away. Indeed, as set forth in Sections IV A.2 and 3, from even before the opening of Crossfire Hurricane, some of those most directly involved in the subsequent investigation had (i) expressed their open disdain for Trump, (ii) asked about when they would open an investigation on Trump, and (iii) asserted that they would prevent Trump from becoming President. As discussed throughout this report, our investigation revealed that the stated basis for opening a full investigation “to determine whether individual(s) associated with the Trump campaign [were] witting of and/or coordinating activities with the Government of Russia” [ ] was seriously flawed. Again, the FBI’s failure to critically analyze information that ran counter to the narrative of a Trump/Russia collusive relationship exhibited throughout Crossfire Hurricane is extremely troublesome.

More highlights of Mark Levin’s remarks yesterday: Democrats challenged Republican election after election, in courts and on the floor of the House, and nobody was charged. Every Republican president is illegitimate according to Democrats. Congress decides on fake electors, not any court – you don’t criminalize these things. Presidents are free to contact state legislatures asking to see what they can do to reverse an election – it’s not a crime. None of this [what Democrats are doing] is about justice or law and order – it’s a revolution with the purpose of destroying the Republican party. Also, there is a national popular vote compact movement being pushed by left-wing groups. They want to change the electoral college system without amending the Constitution. This could be the biggest power grab in Democrat party history. [Democrats] are not about voting, they are about winning.

Levin played this video: Democrats Denying Election Results, Calling Trump Illegitimate President Video: MUST WATCH: 10 minutes of Democrats denying election results. pic.twitter.com/bJRbzEcIO2 — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 23, 2022

This post might be updated later on.

Will Democrat Stacey Abrams be Indicted for Challenging Georgia Election Results (Video)

NOW THAT TRUMP & OTHER REPUBLICANS ARE BEING PERSECUTED FOR SPEECH, LET’S LOOK BACK AT DEMOCRATS’ SPEECH Video: FACT CHECK: Stacey Abrams Says She ‘Did Not Challenge’ Georgia Election Outcome:

If Saying An Election Is Stolen Is A Crime, Why Isn’t Stacey Abrams In Prison? https://t.co/ANYOdvYwZH — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) August 15, 2023 Video Compilation of Stacy Abrams saying the election was stollen from her & that she won. We are no longer a Democracy/Republic when the ruling party throws opposition party leaders in prison for challenging the results of elections. Dark Days pic.twitter.com/M6mlCLgvqX — Melissa Tate (@TheRightMelissa) August 15, 2023

This post might be updated later on.

Will Democrat Chuck Schumer be Indicted for Threatening Supreme Court Justices (Video)

NOW THAT TRUMP IS BEING PERSECUTED FOR SPEECH, LET’S LOOK BACK AT DEMOCRATS’ SPEECH March 4, 2020: Democrat Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer threatened Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch and told them that they will “pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” Schumer said this in front of the Supreme Court at a rally of pro-baby-killing supporters. Video:

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER: Inside the walls of this court, the Supreme Court is hearing arguments, as you know, for the first major abortion right cases since Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch came to the bench. We know what’s at stake. Over the last three years, women’s reproductive rights have come under attack in a way we haven’t seen in modern history. From Louisiana to Missouri to Texas, Republican legislatures are waging a war on women, all women, and they’re taking away fundamental rights. I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. The bottom line is very simple. We will stand with the American people. We will stand with American women. We will tell President Trump and Senate Republicans, who have stacked the court with right-wing ideologues, that you’re going to be gone in November, and you will never be able to do what you’re trying to do now ever, ever again. You hear that over there on the far right? You’re gone in November. We are here to send these folks a message, “Not on our watch.” So, let me ask you, my friends, are we going to let Republicans undo a woman’s right to choose?

Schumer Threatens the Court | Archive (March 4, 2020) Democrats like to accuse President Trump of violating institutional democratic norms, and often he does with his rhetorical broadsides. But at least he’s never directly threatened the U.S. Supreme Court the way Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer did on Wednesday. (…) Yet the comments from Mr. Schumer reflect a significant escalation in Democratic efforts to bully the High Court. Last year five Democratic Senators led by Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.) submitted a brief in which they effectively threatened to pack the Court if it didn’t rule their way in a Second Amendment case. (…) But Mr. Schumer’s tirade takes bullying the judiciary to a new level, and all those who claim to believe in democratic norms should call him out.

Angry Protesters at Supreme Court Justices’ Homes Is Inexcusable; DOJ Refusing to Prosecute (June 1, 2022) [P]ro-abortion protesters are threatening the lives of the five conservative justices…Not only have they threatened the justices, but they have also engaged in illegal protests outside the homes of those justices each week since the leak, in clear violation of federal and state law. (…) [Justice] Barrett protesters are even using bullhorns to shout their profanity-laced slogans, all obviously intended to pressure, coerce, scare, and intimidate a justice of the United States Supreme Court. (…) Federal law is quite clear. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1507, it is a criminal violation of federal law to picket or parade “near a building or residence occupied or used by [a federal] judge, juror, witness, or court officer” with the “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty.” BREAKING NEWS – California man with a weapon and burglary tools is arrested outside Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home after ‘telling cops he wanted to kill him’: Was ‘angry over the Roe. v. Wade leak’ (June 8, 2022) An armed man was detained by authorities outside of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home and told officers he wanted to kill the conservative jurist, it was reported on Wednesday. The individual had at least one weapon on him when he was stopped on a street near the Justice’s Maryland home, the Washington Post reports, where he lives with his wife and two young daughters. Initial findings indicate he was angry about the draft opinion leaked last month that indicated the Supreme Court could be poised to overturn federal abortion protections.

FLASHBACK: Democrat Chuck Schumer threatened SCOTUS Justices Gorsuch & Kavanaugh,: "You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions."https://t.co/QinFbREqKC#FreeSpeech #Trump #TrumpIndictment — Fact REAL (@FactREAL) August 6, 2023 ###

This post might be updated later on.