LIVE: Turning Point Action Conference (7/16/2023, Day 2)

Event: Turning Point Action Conference 2023 (#ActCon2023) Dates: July 15 & 16, 2023 Location: Palm Beach County Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Florida

[Day 1: here.] Day 2: Below Day 2 includes some RINOs like City of Miami Mayor Francis Suarez and Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson. Video via RSNB: RSBNetwork.com | Watch Live | Rumble | YouTube

Turning Point Conference: Turning Point Action is a 501(c)(4) organization founded in 2019 by Charlie Kirk with the mission to embolden the conservative base through grassroots activism and provide voters with the necessary resources to elect true conservative leaders. – Agenda – Speakers: Trump Tucker Megyn Bongino Bannon Cruz Hawley Vance Vivek Gaetz Schmitt Poso Benny Donalds APL AND MORE…#ACTCON2023 starts Saturday… We just made a few last minute tickets available at https://t.co/kn40D7KruX See you in West Palm Beach! — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 13, 2023 .

LIVE: Trump & Other Conservatives Speak at Turning Point Action Conference (7/15/2023, Day 1)

Event: Turning Point Action Conference 2023 (#ActCon2023) Dates: July 15 & 16, 2023 Location: Palm Beach County Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Florida

Video via RSNB: RSBNetwork.com | Watch Live | Rumble | YouTube RSBN started live streaming at 12:30 PM ET. Trump is scheduled to speak at 6:45 PM ET.

Turning Point Conference: Turning Point Action is a 501(c)(4) organization founded in 2019 by Charlie Kirk with the mission to embolden the conservative base through grassroots activism and provide voters with the necessary resources to elect true conservative leaders. – Agenda – Speakers: Trump Tucker Megyn Bongino Bannon Cruz Hawley Vance Vivek Gaetz Schmitt Poso Benny Donalds APL AND MORE…#ACTCON2023 starts Saturday… We just made a few last minute tickets available at https://t.co/kn40D7KruX See you in West Palm Beach! — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 13, 2023 .

NEXT – LIVE: Turning Point Action Conference (7/16/2023, Day 2)

LIVE: CPAC 2021 (Feb. 25-28, 2021)

CPAC: The annual Conservative Political Action Conference Date & city: February 25 – 28, 2021. Orlando, Florida. CPAC: https://cpac.conservative.org/ CPAC (Facebook): https://www.facebook.com/CPAC/ Agenda: https://cpac.conservative.org/agenda/ Speakers: https://cpac.conservative.org/speakers/ Day 2 (Feb. 26, 2021) Via RSBN (YouTube): Via RSBN (Twitter): Watch LIVE: CPAC Resumes on Day 2 in Orlando https://t.co/mysr9M1VbD — RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) February 26, 2021 Other video link: https://www.pscp.tv/RSBNetwork/1MYxNmAWvOpJw

Day 3 (Feb. 27, 2021) Via RSBN (YouTube): Via RSBN (Twitter): Watch LIVE: CPAC 2021 Day Three https://t.co/vQwQWG8pna — RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) February 27, 2021 Other video link: https://www.pscp.tv/w/1zqJVXAgPzMKB

Day 4 (Feb. 28, 2021) Via RSBN (YouTube): Other video link: https://www.pscp.tv/RSBNetwork/1kvKpoQlAgVxE

President Trump expected to speak on Sunday:

For everybody asking:

President Trump will speak at @CPAC on Sunday at 3:40pm ET 🔥‼️

Please tune in! You don’t want to miss this! Trust me! It’ll be HUUGE!

🚨@RSBNetwork will cover it live! pic.twitter.com/IrSuYtdFhC

— Brilyn Hollyhand (@BrilynHollyhand) February 26, 2021

UPDATE: President Trump’s speech at CPAC 2021:
—— RSBN sites: https://www.rsbnetwork.com/, https://www.pscp.tv/RSBNetwork/, https://telegram.me/s/rsbnetwork, https://gab.com/rsbnetwork, https://twitter.com/RSBNetwork, https://www.youtube.com/c/RightSideBroadcastingNetwork/videos.

True Story of Thanksgiving (Read by Rush Limbaugh)

THE REAL MESSAGE IS ABOUT THANKING GOD & HOW SOCIALISM FAILED All that is not being taught at schools. The Real Story of Thanksgiving is about giving thanks to God, NOT to the Indians. “Thanksgiving is a devout expression of gratitude grounded in the tradition of the Bible, both the Old and New Testaments. The true story of Thanksgiving is also about how socialism failed. And how faith, self-reliance, rugged individualism, and free enterprise resulted in prosperity.”

The First Thanksgiving by Jennie A. Brownscombe

“The story of the Pilgrims begins in the early part of the seventeenth century … The Church of England under King James I was persecuting anyone and everyone who did not recognize its absolute civil and spiritual authority. Those who challenged ecclesiastical authority and those who believed strongly in freedom of worship were hunted down, imprisoned, and sometimes executed for their beliefs. A group of separatists first fled to Holland and established a community. After eleven years, about forty of them agreed to make a perilous journey to the New World, where they would certainly face hardships, but could live and worship God according to the dictates of their own consciences. “On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty Pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract, that established just and equal laws for all members of the new community, irrespective of their religious beliefs. Where did the revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact come from? From the Bible. The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example. “And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work. But this was no pleasure cruise, friends. The journey to the New World was a long and arduous one. And when the Pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found — according to Bradford’s detailed journal — a cold, barren, desolate wilderness. There were no friends to greet them, he wrote. There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. And the sacrifice they had made for freedom was just beginning. During the first winter, half the Pilgrims — including Bradford’s own wife — died of either starvation, sickness or exposure. When spring finally came, Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod and skin beavers for coats. “Life improved for the Pilgrims, but they did not yet prosper! This is important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives.” That’s not what it was. “Here is the part that has been omitted: The original contract the Pilgrims had entered into with their merchant-sponsors in London called for everything they produced to go into a common store, and each member of the community was entitled to one common share.” It was a commune. It was socialism. “All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well,” not to the individuals who built them. “Bradford, who had become the new governor of the colony, recognized that this form of collectivism was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as that first harsh winter, which had taken so many lives. He decided to take bold action. Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage.” They could do with it whatever they wanted. He essentially turned loose the free market on ’em. “Long before Karl Marx was even born, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism.” And they found that it didn’t work. “What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else,” because everybody ended up with the same thing at the end of the day. “But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years — trying to refine it, perfect it, and re-invent it — the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently. What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild’s history lesson. ‘The experience that we had in this common course and condition,’ Bradford wrote. ‘The experience that we had in this common course and condition tried sundry years… that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing — as if they were wiser than God. … For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children without any recompense.'” What he was saying was, they found that people could not expect to do their best work without any incentive. So what did they try next? Free enterprise. “Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work and permitted to market its own crops and products. And what was the result? ‘This had very good success,’ wrote Bradford, ‘for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.'” They had miraculous results. In no time they found they had more food than they could eat themselves. So they set up trading posts. They exchanged goods with the Indians. The profits allowed them to pay off the people that sponsored their trip in London. The success and the prosperity of the Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans, began what became known as the great Puritan migration. And they shared their bounty with the Indians. Actually, they sold some of it to ’em. The true story of Thanksgiving is how socialism failed. With all the great expectations and high hopes, it failed. And self-reliance, rugged individualism, free enterprise, whatever you call it, resulted in prosperity that they never dreamed of. Source: As read by Rush Limbaugh from his book See, I Told You So. RELATED THANKSGIVING – As Written by the Pilgrims: The Mayflower Compact, the Pilgrim journals, etc.

Thanksgiving: Pilgrims Wrote how They Failed with Communism; Triumphed with Private Property

The Pilgrims failed with communal ownership required by their investors in London. The Pilgrims succeeded until they instituted private property. The Pilgrims’ venture to the New World was financed by an investment syndicate in London that required the Pilgrims to put everything into a “common pool” which after seven years would be divided equally between investors and Pilgrims. The investors thought this “common wealth” contract condition would increase their probability of collecting their dues by pressuring the Pilgrims to work for “everyone” instead of working for their own private properties. However, once this “communal ownership” was put into practice, it did not increase productivity or community participation. Quite the contrary. This form of communism demoralized the Pilgrims, and gave rise to new problems (i.e., unwillingness to work, confusion, discontent, loss of mutual respect, etc.) — typical of societies that adopt communism/socialism. In brief, the Pilgrims experienced the failure of communal property and decided to replace it with private property, which allowed the colony to finally flourish. This drastic change was recorded by William Bradford, the second governor of Plymouth, in his journal Of Plymouth Plantation. Bradford also criticized Plato’s utopianism where private property would be abolished and citizens would be “guided” by elitists. (Click images to enlarge them) (Scroll down for transcription)

Pilgrim Governor William Bradford, Of Plymouth Plantation, 1623: Modern transcription: All this while no supply was heard of, neither knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in misery. At length, after much debate of things, the Governor (with the advice of the chiefest amongst them) gave way that they should set corn every man for his own particular, and in that regard trust to themselves; in all other things to go on in the general way as before. And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number, for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance) and ranged all boys and youth under some family. This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression. The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato’s and other ancients applauded by some of later times; that the taking away of property and bringing in community into a commonwealth would make them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God. For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For the young men, that were most able and fit for labour and service, did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children without any recompense. The strong, or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labours and victuals, clothes, etc., with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And for men’s wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it. Upon the point all being to have alike, and all to do alike, they thought themselves in the like condition, and one as good as another; and so, if it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take off the mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them. And would have been worse if they had been men of another condition. Let none object this is men’s corruption, and nothing to the course itself. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in His wisdom saw another course fitter for them. RELATED – True Story of Thanksgiving: Thanking God and How Socialism Failed – THANKSGIVING – As Written by the Pilgrims: The Mayflower Compact, the Pilgrim journals, etc. – Pilgrims Set First Thanksgiving Day to Thank God (1621)

Pilgrim’s Thanksgiving: How Communism Failed and Private Property Triumphed

The Pilgrims failed with communal ownership required by their investors in London. The Pilgrims succeeded until they instituted private property. The Pilgrims’ venture to the New World was financed by an investment syndicate in London that required the Pilgrims to put everything into a “common pool” which after seven years would be divided equally between investors and Pilgrims. The investors thought this “common wealth” contract condition would increase their probability of collecting their dues by pressuring the Pilgrims to work for “everyone” instead of working for their own private properties. However, once this “communal ownership” was put into practice, it did not increase productivity or community participation. Quite the contrary. This form of communism demoralized the Pilgrims, and gave rise to new problems (i.e., unwillingness to work, confusion, discontent, loss of mutual respect, etc.) — typical of societies that adopt communism/socialism. In brief, the Pilgrims experienced the failure of communal property and decided to replace it with private property, which allowed the colony to finally flourish. This drastic change was recorded by William Bradford, the second governor of Plymouth, in his journal Of Plymouth Plantation. Bradford also criticized Plato’s utopianism where private property would be abolished and citizens would be “guided” by elitists. (Click images to enlarge them) (Scroll down for transcription)

Pilgrim Governor William Bradford, Of Plymouth Plantation, 1623: Modern transcription: All this while no supply was heard of, neither knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in misery. At length, after much debate of things, the Governor (with the advice of the chiefest amongst them) gave way that they should set corn every man for his own particular, and in that regard trust to themselves; in all other things to go on in the general way as before. And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number, for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance) and ranged all boys and youth under some family. This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression. The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato’s and other ancients applauded by some of later times; that the taking away of property and bringing in community into a commonwealth would make them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God. For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For the young men, that were most able and fit for labour and service, did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children without any recompense. The strong, or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labours and victuals, clothes, etc., with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And for men’s wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it. Upon the point all being to have alike, and all to do alike, they thought themselves in the like condition, and one as good as another; and so, if it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take off the mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them. And would have been worse if they had been men of another condition. Let none object this is men’s corruption, and nothing to the course itself. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in His wisdom saw another course fitter for them. RELATED – True Story of Thanksgiving: Thanking God and How Socialism Failed – THANKSGIVING – As Written by the Pilgrims: The Mayflower Compact, the Pilgrim journals, etc. – Pilgrims Set First Thanksgiving Day to Thank God (1621)